io_uring(7)
π¦ io_uring(7) β Linux Programmerβs Manual π¦
πΈ NAME πΈ
io_uring β asynchronous I/O facility. Thatβs the whole vibe, bestie. π
β¨ SYNOPSIS β¨
#include <linux/io_uring.h>
π DESCRIPTION π
Okay so io_uring is a Linux-specific API for asynchronous I/O. It lets you submit one or more I/O requests, and those requests get processed asynchronously without blocking the calling process. The name comes from ring buffers that are shared between user space and kernel space. This arrangement allows for efficient I/O while avoiding the overhead of copying buffers between them, where possible. It makes io_uring different from other UNIX I/O APIs: instead of just communicating between kernel and user space with system calls, ring buffers are used as the main mode of communication. This arrangement has various performance benefits, and those are discussed in a separate section below. Also, this man page uses the terms shared buffers, shared ring buffers, and queues interchangeably. π«Ά
The general programming model you need to follow for io_uring is outlined below, and itβs giving main character energy:
- Set up shared buffers with
io_uring_setup(2)andmmap(2), mapping into user space shared buffers for the submission queue (SQ) and the completion queue (CQ). You place I/O requests you want to make on the SQ, while the kernel places the results of those operations on the CQ. β - For every I/O request you need to make (like to read a file, write a file, accept a socket connection, etc), you create a submission queue entry, or SQE, describe the I/O operation you need to get done and add it to the tail of the submission queue (SQ). Each I/O operation is, in essence, the equivalent of a system call you would have made otherwise, if you were not using
io_uring. For instance, a SQE with the opcode set toIORING_OP_READwill request a read operation to be issued that is similar to theread(2)system call. Refer to the opcode documentation inio_uring_enter(2)for all supported opcodes and their properties. You can add more than one SQE to the queue depending on the number of operations you want to request. β¨ - After you add one or more SQEs, you need to call
io_uring_enter(2)to tell the kernel to dequeue your I/O requests off the SQ and begin processing them. π₯ - For each SQE you submit, once it is done processing the request, the kernel places a completion queue event or CQE at the tail of the completion queue or CQ. The kernel places exactly one matching CQE in the CQ for every SQE you submit on the SQ. After you retrieve a CQE, minimally, you might be interested in checking the
resfield of the CQE structure, which corresponds to the return value of the system callβs equivalent, had you used it directly without usingio_uring. Given thatio_uringis an async interface,errnois never used for passing back error information. Instead,reswill contain what the equivalent system call would have returned in case of success, and in case of errorreswill contain-errno. For example, if the normal read system call would have returned-1and seterrnotoEINVAL, thenreswould contain-EINVAL. If the normal system call would have returned a read size of1024, thenreswould contain1024. π - Optionally,
io_uring_enter(2)can also wait for a specified number of requests to be processed by the kernel before it returns. If you specified a certain number of completions to wait for, the kernel would have placed at least those many number of CQEs on the CQ, which you can then readily read, right after the return fromio_uring_enter(2). π - It is important to remember that I/O requests submitted to the kernel can complete in any order. It is not necessary for the kernel to process one request after another, in the order you placed them. Given that the interface is a ring, the requests are attempted in order, however that doesnβt imply any sort of ordering on their execution or completion. When more than one request is in flight, it is not possible to determine which one will execute or complete first. When you dequeue CQEs off the CQ, you should always check which submitted request it corresponds to. The most common method for doing so is utilizing the
user_datafield in the request, which is passed back on the completion side. π - Concretely, for operations where strict ordering is required, such as for sends and receives on a stream-oriented TCP socket, it is generally unsafe to have more than one outstanding send, or more than one outstanding receive (the two directions are independent) on a given socket at a time, as the kernel may reorder their execution if poll arming or other background kernel activities are involved. However,
io_uringprovides various facilities to enable applications to efficiently pipeline their operations safely. If the requests are submitted in a single batch, the application may useIOSQE_IO_LINKto enforce an execution order in the kernel. Otherwise,io_uringprovides advanced features like multi shot and send/receive bundles to allow applications to provide more data in fewer, more efficient trips to the kernel. Even if these features are used, applications must still ensure they do not overlap different sends or different receives on a given file. π§
Adding to and reading from the queues:
- You add SQEs to the tail of the SQ. The kernel reads SQEs off the head of the queue. π¦
- The kernel adds CQEs to the tail of the CQ. You read CQEs off the head of the queue. π
It should be noted that depending on the configuration io_uringβs behavior can deviate from the behavior outlined above, like not posting a CQE for every SQE when setting IOSQE_CQE_SKIP_SUCCESS in the SQE or posting multiple CQEs for a single SQE for multi shot operations or requiring an io_uring_enter(2) syscall to make the kernel begin processing newly added SQEs when using submission queue polling. π
π Submission queue polling π
One of the goals of io_uring is to provide a means for efficient I/O. To this end, io_uring supports a polling mode that lets you avoid the call to io_uring_enter(2), which you use to inform the kernel that you have queued SQEs on to the SQ. With SQ Polling, io_uring starts a kernel thread that polls the submission queue for any I/O requests you submit by adding SQEs. With SQ Polling enabled, there is no need for you to call io_uring_enter(2), letting you avoid the overhead of system calls. A designated kernel thread dequeues SQEs off the SQ as you add them and dispatches them for asynchronous processing. π₯
π§ Setting up io_uring π§
The main steps in setting up io_uring consist of mapping in the shared buffers with mmap(2) calls. In the example program included in this man page, the function app_setup_uring() sets up io_uring with a QUEUE_DEPTH deep submission queue. Pay attention to the 2 mmap(2) calls that set up the shared submission and completion queues. If your kernel is older than version 5.4, three mmap(2) calls are required. πΈ
π Submitting I/O requests π
The process of submitting a request consists of describing the I/O operation you need to get done using an io_uring_sqe structure instance. These details describe the equivalent system call and its parameters. Because the range of I/O operations Linux supports are very varied and the io_uring_sqe structure needs to be able to describe them, it has several fields, some packed into unions for space efficiency. Here is a simplified version of struct io_uring_sqe with some of the most often used fields: π
struct io_uring_sqe {
__u8 opcode; /* type of operation for this sqe */
__s32 fd; /* file descriptor to do IO on */
__u64 off; /* offset into file */
__u64 addr; /* pointer to buffer or iovecs */
__u32 len; /* buffer size or number of iovecs */
__u64 user_data; /* data to be passed back at completion time */
__u8 flags; /* IOSQE_ flags */
...
};
Here is struct io_uring_sqe in full:
okay so, the SQE struct itself is the main character here, and it is a lot β but every field is doing something, bestie:
struct io_uring_sqe {
__u8 opcode; /* type of operation for this sqe */
__u8 flags; /* IOSQE_ flags */
__u16 ioprio; /* ioprio for the request */
__s32 fd; /* file descriptor to do IO on */
union {
__u64 off; /* offset into file */
__u64 addr2;
struct {
__u32 cmd_op;
__u32 __pad1;
};
};
union {
__u64 addr; /* pointer to buffer or iovecs */
__u64 splice_off_in;
struct {
__u32 level;
__u32 optname;
};
};
__u32 len; /* buffer size or number of iovecs */
union {
__kernel_rwf_t rw_flags;
__u32 fsync_flags;
__u16 poll_events; /* compatibility */
__u32 poll32_events; /* word-reversed for BE */
__u32 sync_range_flags;
__u32 msg_flags;
__u32 timeout_flags;
__u32 accept_flags;
__u32 cancel_flags;
__u32 open_flags;
__u32 statx_flags;
__u32 fadvise_advice;
__u32 splice_flags;
__u32 rename_flags;
__u32 unlink_flags;
__u32 hardlink_flags;
__u32 xattr_flags;
__u32 msg_ring_flags;
__u32 uring_cmd_flags;
__u32 waitid_flags;
__u32 futex_flags;
__u32 install_fd_flags;
__u32 nop_flags;
};
__u64 user_data; /* data to be passed back at completion time */
/* pack this to avoid bogus arm OABI complaints */
union {
/* index into fixed buffers, if used */
__u16 buf_index;
/* for grouped buffer selection */
__u16 buf_group;
} __attribute__((packed));
/* personality to use, if used */
__u16 personality;
union {
__s32 splice_fd_in;
__u32 file_index;
__u32 optlen;
struct {
__u16 addr_len;
__u16 __pad3[1];
};
};
union {
struct {
__u64 addr3;
__u64 __pad2[1];
};
__u64 optval;
/*
* If the ring is initialized with IORING_SETUP_SQE128, then
* this field is used for 80 bytes of arbitrary command data
*/
__u8 cmd[0];
};
};
To submit an I/O request to io_uring, you grab a submission queue entry (SQE) from the submission queue (SQ), fill it with the details of whatever operation you want to submit, and then call io_uring_enter(2). There are helper functions of the form io_uring_prep_X that exist specifically to make setting up the SQE correct and painless. And if you want to avoid calling io_uring_enter(2), you have the option of setting up Submission Queue Polling. slay.
SQEs get added to the tail of the submission queue. The kernel picks SQEs up off the head of the SQ. The general algorithm to get the next available SQE and update the tail is as follows:
struct io_uring_sqe *sqe;
unsigned tail, index;
tail = *sqring->tail;
index = tail & (*sqring->ring_mask);
sqe = &sqring->sqes[index];
/* fill up details about this I/O request */
describe_io(sqe);
/* fill the sqe index into the SQ ring array */
sqring->array[index] = index;
tail++;
atomic_store_explicit(sqring->tail, tail, memory_order_release);
To get the index of an entry, the application must mask the current tail index with the size mask of the ring. This holds true for both SQs and CQs. Once the SQE is acquired, the necessary fields are filled in, describing the request. While the CQ ring directly indexes the shared array of CQEs, the submission side has an indirection array between them. The submission side ring buffer is an index into this array, which in turn contains the index into the SQEs.
The following code snippet demonstrates how a read operation β the equivalent of a preadv2(2) system call β is described by filling up an SQE with the necessary parameters:
struct iovec iovecs[16];
...
sqe->opcode = IORING_OP_READV;
sqe->fd = fd;
sqe->addr = (unsigned long) iovecs;
sqe->len = 16;
sqe->off = offset;
sqe->flags = 0;
π§ Memory ordering
Modern compilers and CPUs freely reorder reads and writes without affecting the program's outcome, because optimizing performance is literally their whole thing. Some aspects of this need to be kept in mind on SMP systems since io_uring involves buffers shared between kernel and user space. These buffers are both visible and modifiable from kernel and user space. As heads and tails belonging to these shared buffers are updated by kernel and user space, changes need to be coherently visible on either side, irrespective of whether a CPU switch took place after the kernel-user mode switch happened. We use memory barriers to enforce this coherency. Memory barriers are significantly large subjects on their own, so further discussion is out of scope for this man page. For more info on modern memory models, the reader may refer to Documentation/memory-barriers.txt in the kernel tree or to the documentation of the formal C11 or kernel memory model. iykyk.
π£ Letting the kernel know about I/O submissions
Once you place one or more SQEs onto the SQ, you need to let the kernel know that you've done so. You can do this by calling the io_uring_enter(2) system call. This system call is also capable of waiting for a specified count of events to complete. That way, you can be sure to find completion events in the completion queue without having to poll it for events later.
π«Ά SQE pointer lifetimes & data stability
Due to the fixed size of the submission queue entry (SQE), some data you provide in order to perform a desired operation will be passed in the form of a pointer rather than a value. In this situation, you may free the memory backing the pointer once the succeeding io_uring_enter(2) call has completed; providing it is only required by the operation when submitting.
When IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL is not enabled, this is done when you call io_uring_submit(3). In the event IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL is enabled, you must ensure any provided pointers remain valid until completion.
However, very early kernels (5.4 and earlier) required state to be stable until the completion occurred regardless. Applications can test for this behavior by inspecting the IORING_FEAT_SUBMIT_STABLE flag passed back from io_uring_queue_init_params(3).
As an example, the IORING_OP_TIMEOUT operation takes a pointer to a __kernel_timespec struct. This struct is then read by the kernel when you submit the submission queue entries; once submitted, you may free the backing memory of the __kernel_timespec as it will not be read again by the kernel.
π Big caveat, bestie: this behavior does not apply to data that is read or written while the operation is inflight. For example, the pointers to a buffer used as part of anIORING_OP_WRITEorIORING_OP_READoperation must remain valid until completion.
π¬ Reading completion events
Similar to the submission queue (SQ), the completion queue (CQ) is a shared buffer between the kernel and user space. Whereas you placed submission queue entries on the tail of the SQ and the kernel read off the head, when it comes to the CQ, the kernel places completion queue events (CQEs) on the tail of the CQ and you read off its head.
Submission is flexible (and thus a bit more complicated) since it needs to be able to encode different types of system calls that take various parameters. Completion, on the other hand, is simpler since we're looking only for a return value back from the kernel. This is easily understood by looking at the completion queue event structure, struct io_uring_cqe:
struct io_uring_cqe {
__u64 user_data; /* sqe->data submission passed back */
__s32 res; /* result code for this event */
__u32 flags;
};
Here, user_data is custom data that is passed unchanged from submission to completion. That is, from SQEs to CQEs. This field can be used to set context, uniquely identifying submissions that got completed. Given that I/O requests can complete in any order, this field can be used to correlate a submission with a completion. res is the result from the system call that was performed as part of the submission; its return value.
The flags field carries request-specific information. As of the 6.12 kernel, the following flags are defined:
IORING_CQE_F_BUFFERβ If set, the upper 16 bits of theflagsfield carry the buffer ID that was chosen for this request. The request must have been issued withIOSQE_BUFFER_SELECTset, and used with a request type that supports buffer selection. Additionally, buffers must have been provided upfront either via theIORING_OP_PROVIDE_BUFFERSor theIORING_REGISTER_PBUF_RINGmethods.IORING_CQE_F_MOREβ If set, the application should expect more completions from the request. This is used for requests that can generate multiple completions, such as multi-shot requests, receive, or accept.IORING_CQE_F_SOCK_NONEMPTYβ If set, upon receiving the data from the socket in the current request, the socket still had data left on completion of this request.IORING_CQE_F_NOTIFβ Set for notification CQEs, as seen with the zero-copy networking send and receive support.IORING_CQE_F_BUF_MOREβ if this one's set, the buffer ID in the completion is gonna get more completions, okay? Basically the provided buffer got partially eaten β there's still buffer space left β so your app should lowkey be expecting more completions carrying this same buffer ID. Each completion just picks up right where the last one dipped out. This can only happen if the provided buffer ring was set up withIOU_PBUF_RING_INC, which is the flag that enables incremental / partial consumption of buffers. iykyk πIORING_CQE_F_SKIPβ if the ring was configured withIORING_SETUP_CQE_MIXED, then CQEs can get posted with this flag set. When does that even happen? Picture the ring sitting just a single 16b CQE entry away from wrapping, but someone needs to post a 32b CQE π. CQEs have to be contiguous in memory (no gaps allowed, bestie), so a filler/pad CQE has to be posted to make room for the 32b CQE. CQEs with this flag set? Just skip them and ignore them β they literally serve no other purpose than filling a gap in the CQ ring. They're giving placeholder energy. πIORING_CQE_F_32β again, only when the ring was configured withIORING_SETUP_CQE_MIXED. This flag gets set when the CQE is the 32b type. It's telling your app: hey, there's an extra 16b of space in this CQE, so to get to the next CQE you gotta advance the CQ ring by twice as much as you would for a normal 16b CQE. β¨
The general sequence to read completion events off the completion queue is, like, exactly this:
unsigned head;
head = *cqring->head;
if (head != atomic_load_acquire(cqring->tail)) {
struct io_uring_cqe *cqe;
unsigned index;
index = head & (cqring->mask);
cqe = &cqring->cqes[index];
/* process completed CQE */
process_cqe(cqe);
/* CQE consumption complete */
head++;
}
atomic_store_explicit(cqring->head, head, memory_order_release);
Quick vibe check reminder π«Ά β the kernel adds CQEs to the tail of the CQ, while you dequeue them off the head. So to get the index of the entry sitting at the head, your app has to mask the current head index with the size mask of the ring. Once the CQE has been consumed or processed, the head needs updating to reflect that the CQE is done and dusted. And pay attention to the read and write barriers so your read and update of the head actually succeed β no cap, that part matters. π
π io_uring performance π
So because of the shared ring buffers between kernel and user space, io_uring can be a zero-copy system. Copying buffers to and from becomes necessary when system calls that transfer data between kernel and user space are involved β but since the bulk of the communication in io_uring goes via buffers shared between the kernel and user space, that huge performance overhead is completely avoided. iconic behavior honestly π
Now, system calls might not seem like a significant overhead, but in high performance applications, making a lot of them will begin to matter. The workarounds the operating system has in place for Spectre and Meltdown ideally best done away with β unfortunately, some of these workarounds are around the system call interface, which makes system calls not as cheap as before on affected hardware π. Newer hardware shouldn't need these workarounds, but hardware with these vulnerabilities can be expected to be in the wild for a long time, so, yeah. And while using synchronous programming interfaces β or even async ones under Linux β there's at least one system call involved in the submission of each request.
io_uring though? You can batch several requests in one go. Simply queue up multiple SQEs, each describing an I/O operation you want, and make a single call to io_uring_enter(2). This is literally possible due to io_uring's shared buffers based design. ate and left no crumbs π
And while this batching in itself can avoid the overhead associated with potentially multiple and frequent system calls, you can reduce even this overhead further with Submission Queue Polling β have the kernel poll and pick up your SQEs for processing as you add them to the submission queue. That avoids the io_uring_enter(2) call you'd otherwise need to make to tell the kernel to pick SQEs up. For high-performance applications, this means even fewer system call overheads. fewer syscalls = more slay, periodt π₯
β¨ CONFORMING TO β¨
io_uring is Linux-specific. π§π
π EXAMPLES π
okay bestie, this is the part everyone scrolls to π β the example. It uses io_uring to copy stdin to stdout, and because of that, with a lil shell redirection you should be able to copy files with it too. Cute, right? π
Now, important vibe check: it uses a queue depth of only one, so it handles I/O requests one after the other, in a neat little conga line. That is purposefully kept this way to aid understanding π§ β like training wheels but make it systems programming. In real-world scenarios though, you're gonna want a larger queue depth so I/O request processing gets parallelized, and that's where you get the kind of performance benefits io_uring serves up with its asynchronous processing of requests. Periodt β¨
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <sys/uio.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdatomic.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <linux/io_uring.h>
#define QUEUE_DEPTH 1
#define BLOCK_SZ 1024
/* Macros for barriers needed by io_uring */
#define io_uring_smp_store_release(p, v) \
atomic_store_explicit((_Atomic typeof(*(p)) *)(p), (v), \
memory_order_release)
#define io_uring_smp_load_acquire(p) \
atomic_load_explicit((_Atomic typeof(*(p)) *)(p), \
memory_order_acquire)
int ring_fd;
unsigned *sring_tail, *sring_mask, *sring_array,
*cring_head, *cring_tail, *cring_mask;
struct io_uring_sqe *sqes;
struct io_uring_cqe *cqes;
char buff[BLOCK_SZ];
off_t offset;
/*
* System call wrappers provided since glibc does not yet
* provide wrappers for io_uring system calls.
* */
int io_uring_setup(unsigned entries, struct io_uring_params *p)
{
int ret;
ret = syscall(__NR_io_uring_setup, entries, p);
return (ret < 0) ? -errno : ret;
}
int io_uring_enter(int ring_fd, unsigned int to_submit,
unsigned int min_complete, unsigned int flags)
{
int ret;
ret = syscall(__NR_io_uring_enter, ring_fd, to_submit,
min_complete, flags, NULL, 0);
return (ret < 0) ? -errno : ret;
}
int app_setup_uring(void) {
struct io_uring_params p;
void *sq_ptr, *cq_ptr;
/* See io_uring_setup(2) for io_uring_params.flags you can set */
memset(&p, 0, sizeof(p));
ring_fd = io_uring_setup(QUEUE_DEPTH, &p);
if (ring_fd < 0) {
perror("io_uring_setup");
return 1;
}
/*
* io_uring communication happens via 2 shared kernel-user space ring
* buffers, which can be jointly mapped with a single mmap() call in
* kernels >= 5.4.
*/
int sring_sz = p.sq_off.array + p.sq_entries * sizeof(unsigned);
int cring_sz = p.cq_off.cqes + p.cq_entries * sizeof(struct io_uring_cqe);
/* Rather than check for kernel version, the recommended way is to
* check the features field of the io_uring_params structure, which is a
* bitmask. If IORING_FEAT_SINGLE_MMAP is set, we can do away with the
* second mmap() call to map in the completion ring separately.
*/
if (p.features & IORING_FEAT_SINGLE_MMAP) {
if (cring_sz > sring_sz)
sring_sz = cring_sz;
cring_sz = sring_sz;
}
/* Map in the submission and completion queue ring buffers.
* Kernels < 5.4 only map in the submission queue, though.
*/
sq_ptr = mmap(0, sring_sz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_SHARED | MAP_POPULATE,
ring_fd, IORING_OFF_SQ_RING);
if (sq_ptr == MAP_FAILED) {
perror("mmap");
return 1;
}
if (p.features & IORING_FEAT_SINGLE_MMAP) {
cq_ptr = sq_ptr;
} else {
/* Map in the completion queue ring buffer in older kernels separately */
cq_ptr = mmap(0, cring_sz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_SHARED | MAP_POPULATE,
ring_fd, IORING_OFF_CQ_RING);
if (cq_ptr == MAP_FAILED) {
perror("mmap");
return 1;
}
}
/* Save useful fields for later easy reference */
sring_tail = sq_ptr + p.sq_off.tail;
sring_mask = sq_ptr + p.sq_off.ring_mask;
sring_array = sq_ptr + p.sq_off.array;
/* Map in the submission queue entries array */
sqes = mmap(0, p.sq_entries * sizeof(struct io_uring_sqe),
PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_POPULATE,
ring_fd, IORING_OFF_SQES);
if (sqes == MAP_FAILED) {
perror("mmap");
return 1;
}
/* Save useful fields for later easy reference */
cring_head = cq_ptr + p.cq_off.head;
cring_tail = cq_ptr + p.cq_off.tail;
cring_mask = cq_ptr + p.cq_off.ring_mask;
cqes = cq_ptr + p.cq_off.cqes;
return 0;
}
/*
* Read from completion queue.
* In this function, we read completion events from the completion queue.
* We dequeue the CQE, update and head and return the result of the operation.
* */
int read_from_cq() {
struct io_uring_cqe *cqe;
unsigned head;
/* Read barrier */
head = io_uring_smp_load_acquire(cring_head);
/*
* Remember, this is a ring buffer. If head == tail, it means that the
* buffer is empty.
* */
if (head == *cring_tail)
return -1;
/* Get the entry */
cqe = &cqes[head & (*cring_mask)];
if (cqe->res < 0)
fprintf(stderr, "Error: %s\n", strerror(abs(cqe->res)));
head++;
/* Write barrier so that update to the head are made visible */
io_uring_smp_store_release(cring_head, head);
return cqe->res;
}
/*
* Submit a read or a write request to the submission queue.
* */
int submit_to_sq(int fd, int op) {
unsigned index, tail;
/* Add our submission queue entry to the tail of the SQE ring buffer */
tail = *sring_tail;
index = tail & *sring_mask;
struct io_uring_sqe *sqe = &sqes[index];
/* Fill in the parameters required for the read or write operation */
sqe->opcode = op;
sqe->fd = fd;
sqe->addr = (unsigned long) buff;
if (op == IORING_OP_READ) {
memset(buff, 0, sizeof(buff));
sqe->len = BLOCK_SZ;
}
else {
sqe->len = strlen(buff);
}
sqe->off = offset;
sring_array[index] = index;
tail++;
/* Update the tail */
io_uring_smp_store_release(sring_tail, tail);
/*
* Tell the kernel we have submitted events with the io_uring_enter()
* system call. We also pass in the IORING_ENTER_GETEVENTS flag which
* causes the io_uring_enter() call to wait until min_complete
* (the 3rd param) events complete.
* */
int ret = io_uring_enter(ring_fd, 1,1,
IORING_ENTER_GETEVENTS);
if(ret < 0) {
perror("io_uring_enter");
return -1;
}
return ret;
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
int res;
/* Setup io_uring for use */
if(app_setup_uring()) {
fprintf(stderr, "Unable to setup uring!\n");
return 1;
}
/*
* A while loop that reads from stdin and writes to stdout.
* Breaks on EOF.
*/
while (1) {
/* Initiate read from stdin and wait for it to complete */
submit_to_sq(STDIN_FILENO, IORING_OP_READ);
/* Read completion queue entry */
res = read_from_cq();
if (res > 0) {
/* Read successful. Write to stdout. */
submit_to_sq(STDOUT_FILENO, IORING_OP_WRITE);
read_from_cq();
} else if (res == 0) {
/* reached EOF */
break;
}
else if (res < 0) {
/* Error reading file */
fprintf(stderr, "Error: %s\n", strerror(abs(res)));
break;
}
offset += res;
}
return 0;
}
some lil sparkle-notes on what you're looking at, because i got you π«Ά
- the
io_uring_setup/io_uring_enterwrappers exist because glibc does not yet provide wrappers for theio_uringsystem calls β that's literally the comment in the code, not me being dramatic π - instead of checking the kernel version, the recommended move is to check the
featuresfield of theio_uring_paramsstructure (it's a bitmask). IfIORING_FEAT_SINGLE_MMAPis set, you can skip the secondmmap()and map the completion ring together with the submission ring β one call, iconic π - kernels < 5.4 only map in the submission queue, so older kernels need that separate
mmap()for the completion queue ring buffer - the completion queue read uses a load barrier, and the tail update uses a store barrier, so head updates are made visible β ring buffers stay safe, no cap π
io_uring_setup(2)is where you go look atio_uring_params.flagsif you wanna set stuff
π SEE ALSO π
and that's the whole page, bestie!! π this one's a Linux man page, dated 2020-07-26, and it's the io_uring(7) you just read cover to cover β honestly? ate. now go build something with a queue depth bigger than 1, i'm begging π π
π¦ where this page comes from
- fedora 44: liburing-devel 2.13-2.fc44 Β· (GPL-2.0-only WITH Linux-syscall-note OR MIT) AND (LGPL-2.0-or-later OR MIT)
- fedora 44: liburing-devel 2.13-2.fc44 Β· (GPL-2.0-only WITH Linux-syscall-note OR MIT) AND (LGPL-2.0-or-later OR MIT)
- π the page's license: LGPL-2.0-or-later
- Copyright (C) 2020 Shuveb Hussain <shuveb@gmail.com>
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms