Lingua::Identify(3pm)
๐ NAME ๐
okay bestie, you're looking at Lingua::Identify(3pm) from the User Contributed Perl Documentation, and the whole point of Lingua::Identify is โ wait for it โ language identification. That's it. That's the gig. ๐
โจ SYNOPSIS โจ
the quick way, like the "I have three seconds and a dream" way:
use Lingua::Identify qw(:language_identification);
$a = langof($textstring); # gives the most probable language
or the complete way:
@a = langof($textstring); # gives pairs of languages / probabilities
# sorted from most to least probable
%a = langof($textstring); # gives a hash of language / probability
or the expert way (go read the section OPTIONS, under HOW TO PERFORM IDENTIFICATION, iykyk):
$a = langof( { method => [qw/smallwords prefix2 suffix2/] }, $text);
$a = langof( { 'max-size' => 3_000_000 }, $text);
$a = langof( { 'extract_from' => ( 'head' => 1, 'tail' => 2)}, $text);
๐ธ DESCRIPTION ๐ธ
STARTING WITH VERSION 0.25, Lingua::Identify IS UNICODE BY DEFAULT! ๐
"Lingua::Identify" identifies the language a given string or file is written in. fr fr, that's the entire job description.
Wanna know why this module eats? Go see the section WHY LINGUA::IDENTIFY for a list of "Lingua::Identify"'s strong points. ๐ช
Wanna know which languages it can even handle? See the section KNOWN LANGUAGES for the list of available languages, and HOW TO PERFORM IDENTIFICATION to actually know how to use this module properly. ๐
If you're in a hurry, jump to the section EXAMPLES, way down below. ๐โโ๏ธ๐จ
Also, don't forget to read the following section, IMPORTANT WARNING. Not optional, bestie. ๐ซถ
๐จ A WARNING ON THE ACCURACY OF LANGUAGE IDENTIFICATION METHODS ๐จ
okay so imagine this: take a word that exists in two different languages, stare at it really hard, and answer this question: "What language does this word belong to?" ๐
You literally can't answer with a clean "Language X", right? All you can say is that it looks like it could belong to any one of a whole set of languages. That's the tea.
Same energy with texts: it isn't always easy to identify the language of a text if the only two active languages are super similar to each other. ๐ญ
Now that we've gotten the warning out of the way โ the one that says language identification is not 100% accurate โ please keep reading the documentation. ๐
๐ WHY LINGUA::IDENTIFY ๐
You might be sitting there wondering why you'd use Lingua::Identify instead of literally any other tool for language identification. Valid question, here's the receipts โ a list of Lingua::Identify's strong points:
- it's free and it's open-source; ๐
- it's portable (it's Perl, which means it will work in lots of different platforms); ๐
- unicode support; โจ
- 4 different methods of language identification and growing (see METHODS OF LANGUAGE IDENTIFICATION for more details on this one); ๐
- it's a module, which means you can easily write your own application (be it CGI, TK, whatever) around it; ๐ ๏ธ
- it comes with langident, which means you don't actually need to write your own application around it; ๐
- it's flexible (at the moment, you can actually choose the methods to use and their relevance, the max size of input to analyze each time and which part(s) of the input to analyze) ๐คธโโ๏ธ
- it supports big inputs (through the
'max-size'and'extract_from'options) ๐ - it's easy to deal with languages (you can activate and deactivate the ones you choose whenever you want to, which can improve your times and accuracy); ๐๏ธ
- it's maintained. ๐
๐ง HOW TO PERFORM IDENTIFICATION ๐ง
๐ langof
To identify the language a given text is written in, use the langof function. If you want a single value, do:
$language = langof($text);
To get the most probable language and also the percentage of its probability, do:
($language, $probability) = langof($text);
If you want a hash where each active language is mapped into its percentage, use this:
%languages = langof($text);
โ๏ธ OPTIONS โ๏ธ
langof can also be handed some configuration parameters, like this:
$language = langof(\%config, $text);
These parameters are detailed right here, bestie:
extract-fromโ When the size of the input exceeds the'max-size',"langof"analyzes only the beginning of the file. You can specify which part of the file is analyzed with the'extract-from'option:
langof( { 'extract_from' => 'tail' } , $text );
Possible values are 'head' and 'tail' (for now).
You can also specify more than one part of the file, so that text is extracted from those parts:
langof( { 'extract_from' => [ 'head', 'tail' ] } , $text );
(this will be useful when more than two possibilities exist) โจ
You can also specify different values for each part of the file (not necessarily for all of them:
langof( { 'extract_from' => { head => 40, tail => 60 } } , $text);
The line above, for instance, retrieves 40% of the text from the beginning and 60% from the end. Note, however, that those values are not percentages. You'd get the same behavior with:
langof( { 'extract_from' => { head => 80, tail => 120 } } , $text);
The percentages would be the same. math is math. ๐ค
max-sizeโ By default,"langof"analyzes only 1,000,000 bytes. You can specify how many bytes (at the most) can be analyzed (if not enough exist, the whole input is still analyzed).
langof( { 'max-size' => 2000 }, $text);
If you want all the text to be analyzed, set max-size to 0:
langof( { 'max-size' => 0 }, $text);
See also "set_max_size".
methodโ You can choose which method or methods to use, and also the relevance of each of them.
To choose a single method to use:
langof( {method => 'smallwords' }, $text);
To choose several methods:
langof( {method => [qw/prefixes2 suffixes2/]}, $text);
To choose several methods and give them different weight:
langof( {method => {smallwords => 0.5, ngrams3 => 1.5} }, $text);
To see the list of available methods, see section METHODS OF LANGUAGE IDENTIFICATION.
If no method is specified, the configuration for this parameter is the following (this might change in the future):
method => {
smallwords => 0.5,
prefixes2 => 1,
suffixes3 => 1,
ngrams3 => 1.3
};
modeโ By default,"Lingua::Identify"assumes"normal"mode, but others are available.
In "dummy" mode, instead of actually calculating anything, "Lingua::Identify" only does the preparation it has to and then returns a bunch of information, including the list of the active languages, the selected methods, etc. It also returns the text meant to be analised.
Do be warned that, with langof_file, the dummy mode still reads the files, it simply doesn't calculate language. ๐ฌ
langof( { 'mode' => 'dummy' }, $text);
This returns something like this:
{ 'methods' => { 'smallwords' => '0.5',
'prefixes2' => '1',
},
'config' => { 'mode' => 'dummy' },
'max-size' => 1000000,
'active-languages' => [ 'es', 'pt' ],
'text' => $text,
'mode' => 'dummy',
}
๐ langof_file ๐
langof_file works just like langof, with the exception that it reveives filenames instead of text. It reads these texts (if existing and readable, of course) and parses its content. ๐ซถ
Currently, langof_file assumes the files are regular text. This may change in the future and the files might be scanned to check their filetype and then parsed to extract only their textual content (which should be pretty useful so that you can perform language identification, say, in HTML files, or PDFs). ๐ฎ
To identify the language a file is written in:
$language = langof_file($path);
To get the most probable language and also the percentage of its probability, do:
($language, $probability) = langof_file($path);
If you want a hash where each active language is mapped into its percentage, use this:
%languages = langof_file($path);
If you pass more than one file to langof_file, they will all be read and their content merged and then parsed for language identification. ๐งฌ
โ๏ธ OPTIONS โ๏ธ
langof_file accepts all the options langof does, so refer to those first (up in this document).
$language = langof_file(\%config, $path);
langof_file currently only reads the first 10,000 bytes of each file. ๐
You can force an input encoding with "{ encoding => 'ISO-8859-1' }" in the configuration hash.
๐ confidence ๐
After getting the results into an array, its first element is the most probable language. That doesn't mean it is very probable or not. ๐
You can find more about the likeliness of the results to be accurate by computing its confidence level.
use Lingua::Identify qw/:language_identification/;
my @results = langof($text);
my $confidence_level = confidence(@results);
# $confidence_level now holds a value between 0.5 and 1; the higher that
# value, the more accurate the results seem to be
The formula used is pretty simple: p1 / (p1 + p2) , where p1 is the probability of the most likely language and p2 is the probability of the language which came in second. A couple of examples to illustrate this:
English 50% Portuguese 10% ...
confidence level: 50 / (50 + 10) = 0.83
Another example:
Spanish 30% Portuguese 10% ...
confidence level: 30 / (25 + 30) = 0.55
French 10% German 5% ...
confidence level: 10 / (10 + 5) = 0.67
As you can see, the first example is probably the most accurate one. Are there any doubts? The English language has five times the probability of the second language. ๐ฅ
The second example is a bit more tricky. 55% confidence. The confidence level is always above 50%, for obvious reasons. 55% doesn't make anyone confident in the results, and one shouldn't be, with results such as these. ๐
Notice the third example. The confidence level goes up to 67%, but the probability of French is of mere 10%. So what? It's twice as much as the second language. The low probability may well be caused by a great number of languages in play. ๐ญ
๐งฐ get_all_methods ๐งฐ
Returns a list comprised of all the available methods for language identification.
๐ LANGUAGE IDENTIFICATION IN GENERAL ๐
Language identification is based in patterns. ๐งต
In order to identify the language a given text is written in, we repeat a given process for each active language (see section LANGUAGES MANIPULATION); in that process, we look for common patterns of that language. Those patterns can be prefixes, suffixes, common words, ngrams or even sequences of words. ๐
After repeating the process for each language, the total score for each of them is then used to compute the probability (in percentage) for each language to be the one of that text. ๐
๐ธ METHODS OF LANGUAGE IDENTIFICATION ๐ธ
okay so Lingua::Identify lowkey has four whole different ways of doing language ID, and when you count all the variations it's actually thirteen whole methods. thirteen!! ๐
here's the full roster, bestie: smallwords, prefixes1, prefixes2, prefixes3, prefixes4, suffixes1, suffixes2, suffixes3, suffixes4, ngrams1, ngrams2, ngrams3 and ngrams4.
and now the deep dive on each one, because you deserve the lore ๐
๐ Small Word Technique โ smallwords ๐
the "Small Word Technique" (iconic name, no notes) goes through your text hunting for the most common words of every language that's currently active. these are usually articles, pronouns, that whole squad โ and they also happen to be (usually!) the shortest words in the language. hence the name, iykyk.
this one is usually a good method for big texts, especially if you've only got a few languages active. big text + small language pool = slay. โจ
๐ฆ Prefix Analysis โ prefixes1, prefixes2, prefixes3, prefixes4 ๐ฆ
this method reads your text and looks at the common prefixes of each active language.
the four methods are, respectively, for prefixes of size 1, 2, 3 and 4. so like. prefixes1 is single characters, prefixes4 is four at a time. easy.
๐ Suffix Analysis โ suffixes1, suffixes2, suffixes3, suffixes4 ๐
literally the same energy as Prefix Analysis (scroll up bestie, it's right there ๐) except instead of prefixes it's out here analysing common suffixes.
and yes, the methods are, respectively, for suffixes of size 1, 2, 3 and 4. mirror image, we love a matching set ๐ซถ
โญ Ngram Categorization โ ngrams1, ngrams2, ngrams3, ngrams4 โญ
ngrams are sequences of tokens. you can think of them like syllables if that helps, but ngl they're more than that, because they're not just made of characters โ they also include spaces (the ones that delimit or separate words). so yeah, spaces are part of the vibe.
ngrams are a very good way to identify languages, because the most common ngrams of any given language are generally not very common in the others. that's the whole trick. ๐ฅ
this is usually the best method for small amounts of text or when you have too many active languages. tiny text? too many languages in the mix? ngrams ate. ๐
and the methods are, respectively, for ngrams of size 1, 2, 3 and 4. periodt.
๐ LANGUAGE MANIPULATION ๐
so when Lingua::Identify is doing its identification thing, it does not work with every language it knows about. it works with the ones that are active. that's the whole distinction, bestie.
by default, all available languages are active โ but the user can absolutely change that. your call, your rules. ๐
and for your convenience, a whole bunch of methods were made just for messing with languages. to use them, load the module with the tag :language_manipulation.
these methods work with the two letters code for languages. two letters. that's it. ๐
activate_languageโ Activate a language
activate_language('en');
# or
activate_language($_) for get_all_languages();
activate_all_languagesโ Activates all languages
activate_all_languages();
deactivate_languageโ Deactivates a language
deactivate_language('en');
deactivate_all_languagesโ Deactivates all languages
deactivate_all_languages();
get_all_languagesโ Returns the names of all available languages
my @all_languages = get_all_languages();
get_active_languagesโ Returns the names of all active languages
my @active_languages = get_active_languages();
get_inactive_languagesโ Returns the names of all inactive languages
my @active_languages = get_inactive_languages();
yes bestie, the variable in that example really is called@active_languageseven though the function isget_inactive_languages. that's just how it is in the source. we don't question the ancestors. ๐
is_activeโ Returns the name of the language if it is active, an empty list otherwise
if (is_active('en')) {
# YOUR CODE HERE
}
is_valid_languageโ Returns the name of the language if it exists, an empty list otherwise
if (is_valid_language('en')) {
# YOUR CODE HERE
}
set_active_languagesโ Sets the active languages
set_active_languages('en', 'pt');
# or
set_active_languages(get_all_languages());
name_ofโ Given the two letter tag of a language, returns its name
my $language_name = name_of('pt');
๐ KNOWN LANGUAGES ๐
as of right now, Lingua::Identify knows the following languages โ that's 33 total, bestie. thirty-three!! ๐ญ๐
- AF โ Afrikaans
- BG โ Bulgarian
- BR โ Breton
- BS โ Bosnian
- CY โ Welsh
- DA โ Danish
- DE โ German
- EN โ English
- EO โ Esperanto
- ES โ Spanish
- FI โ Finnish
- FR โ French
- FY โ Frisian
- GA โ Irish
- HR โ Croatian
- HU โ Hungarian
- ID โ Indonesian
- IS โ Icelandic
- IT โ Italian
- LA โ Latin
- MS โ Malay
- NL โ Dutch
- NO โ Norwegian
- PL โ Polish
- PT โ Portuguese
- RO โ Romanian
- RU โ Russian
- SL โ Slovene
- SO โ Somali
- SQ โ Albanian
- SV โ Swedish
- SW โ Swahili
- TR โ Turkish
๐ซถ CONTRIBUTING WITH NEW LANGUAGES ๐ซถ
okay so please do not contribute modules you made yourself. like, don't. it's way easier to contribute with unprocessed text, because that means new versions of Lingua::Identify don't have to drop languages if I can't contact you by that time. and nobody wants a language getting dropped, that's tragic. ๐ญ
if you absolutely must, use make-lingua-identify-language to create a new module for your own personal use โ but fr fr, try to contribute with unprocessed text rather than those modules. that's the move. ๐
โจ EXAMPLES โจ
๐ธ THE BASIC EXAMPLE ๐ธ
check the language a given text file is written in:
use Lingua::Identify qw/langof/;
my $text = join "\n", <>;
# identify the language by letting the module decide on the best way
# to do so
my $language = langof($text);
๐ฆ IDENTIFYING BETWEEN TWO LANGUAGES ๐ฆ
check the language a given text file is written in, assuming you happen to know it's either Portuguese or English:
use Lingua::Identify qw/langof set_active_languages/;
set_active_languages(qw/pt en/);
my $text = join "\n", <>;
# identify the language by letting the module decide on the best way
# to do so
my $language = langof($text);
โญ TO DO โญ
the wishlist, the vision board, the "we'll get there" list ๐
- WordNgrams based methods;
- More languages (always);
- File recognition and treatment;
- Deal with different encodings;
- Create sets of languages and allow their activation/deactivation;
- There should be a way of knowing the default configuration (other than using the dummy mode, of course, or than accessing the variables directly);
- Add a section about other similar tools.
๐ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ๐
these people and/or projects helped during this tool's development, shoutout to them fr:
- EuroParl v5 corpus was used to train Dutch, German, English, Spanish, Finish, French, Italian, Portuguese, Danish and Swedish.
๐ SEE ALSO ๐
langident(1),Text::ExtractWords(3),Text::Ngram(3),Text::Affixes(3).- ISO 639 Language Codes, at http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ert/iso639.htm
๐ AUTHOR ๐
Alberto Simoes, <ambs@cpan.org>
Jose Castro, <cog@cpan.org>
๐ COPYRIGHT & LICENSE ๐
Copyright 2008-2010 Alberto Simoes, All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2004-2008 Jose Castro, All Rights Reserved.
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself.
and that's the whole page bestie, we made it to the end!! ๐ฆโจ this was Lingua::Identify(3pm) from the User Contributed Perl Documentation, living in perl v5.34.0 and dated 2022-05-28 โ go forth and identify some languages, you absolute main character ๐
๐
๐ฆ where this page comes from
- debian bookworm: liblingua-identify-perl 0.56-2 ยท GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl
- debian trixie: liblingua-identify-perl 0.56-2 ยท GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl
- ubuntu noble: liblingua-identify-perl 0.56-2 ยท GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl
- ubuntu resolute: liblingua-identify-perl 0.56-2 ยท GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl
- ubuntu stonking: liblingua-identify-perl 0.56-2 ยท GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl
- ๐ girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms