std::unique_lock::mutex(3)

πŸ“¦ version 2024.07.05, in nixpkgs unstable, opensuse-leap 16.0

🌟 std::unique_lock::mutex(3) 🌟

okay so this is the page for std::unique_lock::mutex(3) from the C++ Standard Libary manual, and it’s literally all about std::unique_lock::mutex. Group-chat recap: it’s giving tiny member function, big main character energy, and ngl, it’s a short one, fr fr. The vibe check is simple: keep every detail. 🫢


πŸ’– NAME πŸ’–

std::unique_lock::mutex - std::unique_lock::mutex

Yes bestie, the name is the same thing twice. The page says it like that, and we are not arguing with the page. Iconic behavior, honestly. πŸ’…

✨ Synopsis ✨

mutex_type* mutex() const noexcept;  (since C++11)

It returns a pointer to the associated mutex, or a null pointer if there is no associated mutex. We’re obsessed with how straightforward it is. πŸ¦‹

πŸ’… Parameters πŸ’…

None. Zero. Not a single parameter. The page literally says (none), and that’s the tea. 🍡

πŸŽ€ Return value πŸŽ€

Pointer to the associated mutex or a null pointer if there is no associated mutex. Same energy as the synopsis, because that’s the return value, periodt. πŸ’–

πŸ¦‹ Example πŸ¦‹

This section is incomplete.

Reason: no example.

not me opening the example section and finding no example 😭 But that’s what the page says, so we’re saying it too. No invented examples, no cap. 🫢

πŸ“ Category πŸ“

  • Todo no example

Category tag spotted: Todo no example. Lowkey a mood. 🌈


xoxo, your Unix bestie πŸ’… Source/version/date: http://cppreference.com, 2024.06.10, page std::unique_lock::mutex(3). Bye bestie, slay your pointer checks! πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from