LIBRESSL-SSL_CTX_SET_SECURITY_LEVEL(3)

πŸ“¦ version 4.4.0, in alpine 3.24, arch rolling

πŸ’… SSL_CTX_set_security_level & friends: the TLS security-level glow-up

okay so this is the LIBRESSL-SSL_CTX_SET_SECURITY_LEVEL(3) page from the Library Functions Manual, and it’s literally all about changing the security level for TLS. Bestie, we’re in it πŸ’–


🌸 NAME 🌸

SSL_CTX_set_security_level, SSL_set_security_level, SSL_CTX_get_security_level, SSL_get_security_level β€” change security level for TLS ✨


πŸŽ€ SYNOPSIS πŸŽ€

ok so the synopsis is giving exactly this:

library β€œlibssl” libcrypto
#include <openssl/ssl.h>
void
SSL_CTX_set_security_level(SSL_CTX *ctx, int level);

void
SSL_set_security_level(SSL *s, int level);

int
SSL_CTX_get_security_level(const SSL_CTX *ctx);

int
SSL_get_security_level(const SSL *s);

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

A security level is a set of restrictions on algorithms, key lengths, protocol versions, and other features in TLS connections. These restrictions apply in addition to those that exist from individually selecting supported features, for example ciphers, curves, or algorithms. No cap, it’s an extra layer of β€œbestie, maybe don’t” πŸ’…

Here’s the table of properties for the various security levels β€” exactly the vibe check:

      # sec   RSA ECC TLS MAC
      0   0     0   0 1.0 MD5
      1  80  1024 160 1.0 RC4
      2 112  2048 224 1.0
      3 128  3072 256 1.1 SHA1
      4 192  7680 384 1.2
      5 256 15360 512 1.2

The meaning of the columns is as follows:

  • # β€” the number of the level.
  • sec β€” the minimum security strength measured in bits, which is approximately the binary logarithm of the number of operations an attacker has to perform in order to break a cryptographic key. This minimum strength is enforced for all relevant parameters including cipher suite encryption algorithms, ECC curves, signature algorithms, DH parameter sizes, and certificate algorithms and key sizes. See SP800-57 below under SEE ALSO for details on individual algorithms.
  • RSA β€” the minimum key length in bits for the RSA and DH algorithms.
  • ECC β€” the minimum key length in bits for ECC algorithms.
  • TLS β€” the minimum TLS protocol version.
  • MAC β€” cipher suites using the given MACs are allowed on this level and on lower levels, but not on higher levels.

Level 0 is only provided for backward compatibility and permits everything. It’s the β€œno rules, just vibes” level, but make of that what you will πŸ‘€

Level 3 and higher disable support for session tickets and only accept cipher suites that provide forward secrecy. Slay for security, lowkey strict about it πŸ”₯

The functions SSL_CTX_set_security_level() and SSL_set_security_level() choose the security level for ctx or s, respectively. If not set, security level 1 is used.

SSL_CTX_new(3) initializes the security level of the new object to 1.

SSL_new(3) and SSL_set_SSL_CTX(3) copy the security level from the context to the SSL object.

SSL_dup(3) copies the security level from the old to the new object. Copy-paste but make it cryptographic πŸ’–


⭐ RETURN VALUES ⭐

SSL_CTX_get_security_level() and SSL_get_security_level() return the security level configured in ctx or s, respectively. The getter girlies are just reporting the number, periodt 🫢


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

Elaine Barker, Recommendation for Key Management, U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Special Publication 800-57 Part 1 Revision 5, https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-57pt1r5, Gaithersburg, MD, May 2020.

🧚 HISTORY 🧚

These functions first appeared in OpenSSL 1.1.0 and have been available since OpenBSD 7.2. iconic behavior, honestly ✨


πŸ’€ CAVEATS πŸ’€

Applications which do not check the return values of configuration functions will misbehave. For example, if an application does not check the return value after trying to set a certificate and the certificate is rejected because of the security level, the application may behave as if no certificate had been provided at all. Not me forgetting the return value check… couldn’t be me πŸ™ˆ

While some restrictions may be handled gracefully by negotiations between the client and the server, other restrictions may be fatal and abort the TLS handshake. For example, this can happen if the peer certificate contains a key that is too short or if the DH parameter size is too small. So yeah, sometimes it’s a whole dramatic handshake breakup 😭


mwah πŸ’‹ this page is from Debian, dated June 8, 2025, and it’s the SSL_CTX_SET_SECURITY_LEVEL(3) manual page β€” bye bestie, go check those return values 🫢🌸

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from