lapacke_ztgexc_work.c(3)
β¨ NAME β¨
Okay so bestie, you opened the LAPACK manual page for lapacke_ztgexc_work.c(3) β and the actual NAME is lapacke_ztgexc_work.c. That's the whole name vibe, no cap. π
π SYNOPSIS π
First thing, include this header exactly:
#include 'lapacke_utils.h'
π§ Functions π§
Here's the function, and yes, every single argument is staying right here:
lapack_int LAPACKE_ztgexc_work (int matrix_layout, lapack_logical wantq,
lapack_logical wantz, lapack_int n, lapack_complex_double *a,
lapack_int lda, lapack_complex_double *b, lapack_int ldb,
lapack_complex_double *q, lapack_int ldq, lapack_complex_double *z,
lapack_int ldz, lapack_int ifst, lapack_int ilst)
π Function Documentation π
The main-character function again, this time in the Function Documentation section:
lapack_int LAPACKE_ztgexc_work (int matrix_layout, lapack_logical wantq,
lapack_logical wantz, lapack_int n, lapack_complex_double * a,
lapack_int lda, lapack_complex_double * b, lapack_int ldb,
lapack_complex_double * q, lapack_int ldq, lapack_complex_double * z,
lapack_int ldz, lapack_int ifst, lapack_int ilst)
Definition at line 36 of file lapacke_ztgexc_work.c. That's the whole definition detail, periodt. π
π Author π
Author section says: Generated automatically by Doxygen for LAPACK from the source code. So it's auto-generated, bestie β Doxygen did that, for LAPACK, from the source code. Slay, I guess? πβ¨
Cute sign-off time: this whole page is Version 3.8.0, dated Tue Nov 14 2017, and it's the lapacke_ztgexc_work.c(3) page. Byeee, go be iconic with your complex doubles π«Άπ
π¦ where this page comes from
- centos-stream 9: lapack 3.9.0-10.el9 Β· BSD
- centos-stream 9: lapack 3.9.0-10.el9 Β· BSD
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms