lapacke_ztfttr_work.c(3)

πŸ“¦ version 3.9.0, in centos-stream 9

🌸 NAME 🌸

okay so bestie, you opened the lapacke_ztfttr_work.c(3) page β€” the manual name is LAPACK β€” and the NAME section is literally just lapacke_ztfttr_work.c. No extra lore. Periodt. πŸ’…

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

First things first, the include is giving very specific header energy:

       #include 'lapacke_utils.h'

🧚 Functions 🧚

There is exactly one function listed here, and she is the main character:

  • LAPACKE_ztfttr_work β€” here's the signature, copied exactly and looking iconic:
       lapack_int LAPACKE_ztfttr_work (int matrix_layout, char transr, char
           uplo, lapack_int n, const lapack_complex_double *arf,
           lapack_complex_double *a, lapack_int lda)

πŸ”₯ Function Documentation πŸ”₯

The function is LAPACKE_ztfttr_work, and the docs show this exact signature:

   lapack_int LAPACKE_ztfttr_work (int matrix_layout, char transr, char uplo,
       lapack_int n, const lapack_complex_double * arf, lapack_complex_double *
       a, lapack_int lda)
Definition at line 36 of file lapacke_ztfttr_work.c.

No cap, that's the whole documentation vibe: signature + where she lives in the source. 🫢

πŸ¦‹ Author πŸ¦‹

This part is literally:

Generated automatically by Doxygen for LAPACK from the source code.

So yeah, Doxygen did that. Automated icon behavior. πŸ’–


mwah, bestie β€” this page is from Version 3.8.0, dated Tue Nov 14 2017, and it's the lapacke_ztfttr_work.c(3) page. Bye and slay! πŸ’‹βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from