lapacke_zptsv_work.c(3)
β¨ NAME β¨
lapacke_zptsv_work.c β that's the manual name, bestie π. This is the LAPACK page for it, and yes, the whole thing is basically one function's moment in the spotlight. No cap.
π¦ SYNOPSIS π¦
okay so first you pull in this header:
#include 'lapacke_utils.h'
π« Functions π«
There's exactly one function here, and it's giving:
lapack_int LAPACKE_zptsv_work (int matrix_layout, lapack_int n,
lapack_int nrhs, double *d, lapack_complex_double *e,
lapack_complex_double *b, lapack_int ldb)
π Function Documentation π
πΈ LAPACKE_zptsv_work πΈ
The documentation block repeats the signature exactly like this:
lapack_int LAPACKE_zptsv_work (int matrix_layout, lapack_int n, lapack_int
nrhs, double * d, lapack_complex_double * e, lapack_complex_double * b,
lapack_int ldb)
And the location note is literally:
Definition at line 36 of file lapacke_zptsv_work.c.
That's the whole documentation vibe: function signature, line 36, done. π
π«Ά Author π«Ά
The author line says, exact words:
Generated automatically by Doxygen for LAPACK from the source code.
So yeah, Doxygen generated it for LAPACK from the source code β not me, I'm just giving it main character energy. π
byeee bestie π¦β¨ this page is lapacke_zptsv_work.c(3), from LAPACK version 3.8.0, dated Tue Nov 14 2017. Periodt. π
π¦ where this page comes from
- centos-stream 9: lapack 3.9.0-10.el9 Β· BSD
- centos-stream 9: lapack 3.9.0-10.el9 Β· BSD
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms