lapacke_zpb_trans.c(3)

πŸ“¦ version 3.9.0, in centos-stream 9

πŸ¦‹ lapacke_zpb_trans.c(3) πŸ¦‹

okay bestie, this page is from the LAPACK manual and it is literally a one-function situation. very short, very demure, no cap. πŸ’…

πŸŽ€ NAME πŸŽ€

lapacke_zpb_trans.c β€” that's the whole name, and yes it's giving "file name as a manual page title." iconic behavior honestly. ✨

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

#include 'lapacke_utils.h'

🫢 Functions 🫢

the one and only function listed here is this cutie:

       void LAPACKE_zpb_trans (int matrix_layout, char uplo, lapack_int n,
           lapack_int kd, const lapack_complex_double *in, lapack_int ldin,
           lapack_complex_double *out, lapack_int ldout)

πŸ’– Function Documentation πŸ’–

🌸 LAPACKE_zpb_trans 🌸

okay so here's the signature again, same details, with the pointer spacing exactly how the original doc had it:

   void LAPACKE_zpb_trans (int matrix_layout, char uplo, lapack_int n,
       lapack_int kd, const lapack_complex_double * in, lapack_int ldin,
       lapack_complex_double * out, lapack_int ldout)

Definition at line 40 of file lapacke_zpb_trans.c.

no extra parameter lore on this page β€” the manual is being mysterious, and honestly that's its main character energy. πŸ”₯

πŸ‘‘ Author πŸ‘‘

Generated automatically by Doxygen for LAPACK from the source code.

so true, bestie, the robots wrote this one and we respect them for it. 🫢


✨ mwah πŸ’‹ this lil page is LAPACK version 3.8.0, dated Tue Nov 14 2017, and the page is lapacke_zpb_trans.c(3) β€” bye bye, hope this helped! πŸŽ€πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from