lapacke_ctbrfs.c(3)
π NAME π
okay so bestie, this is lapacke_ctbrfs.c(3) from the LAPACK manual β the NAME line is literally just lapacke_ctbrfs.c, and we're about to get into LAPACKE_ctbrfs. no cap. β¨
π¦ SYNOPSIS π¦
The include situation is exactly this, bestie:
#include 'lapacke_utils.h'
β¨ Functions β¨
Here's the function signature, copied with love and zero typos:
lapack_int LAPACKE_ctbrfs (int matrix_layout, char uplo, char trans,
char diag, lapack_int n, lapack_int kd, lapack_int nrhs, const
lapack_complex_float *ab, lapack_int ldab, const
lapack_complex_float *b, lapack_int ldb, const lapack_complex_float
*x, lapack_int ldx, float *ferr, float *berr)
That's a lapack_int return type, and the params are matrix_layout, uplo, trans, diag, n, kd, nrhs, ab, ldab, b, ldb, x, ldx, ferr, and berr. The types are all right there in the code block, so no guessing. π
π Function Documentation π
π lapack_int LAPACKE_ctbrfs π
Same function, same exact signature, now in the Function Documentation zone:
lapack_int LAPACKE_ctbrfs (int matrix_layout, char uplo, char trans, char
diag, lapack_int n, lapack_int kd, lapack_int nrhs, const
lapack_complex_float * ab, lapack_int ldab, const lapack_complex_float *
b, lapack_int ldb, const lapack_complex_float * x, lapack_int ldx, float
* ferr, float * berr)
Definition at line 36 of file lapacke_ctbrfs.c.
That line number is not a vibe, it's a fact: line 36, file lapacke_ctbrfs.c. periodt. π₯
π Author π
Doxygen generated this automatically for LAPACK from the source code. So the author section is basically βthe robots did it,β bestie. π€π
LAPACK Version 3.8.0 β Tue Nov 14 2017, and that's the lapacke_ctbrfs.c(3) sign-off, bestie. slay and happy LAPACK-ing. π«Άβ¨
π¦ where this page comes from
- centos-stream 9: lapack 3.9.0-10.el9 Β· BSD
- centos-stream 9: lapack 3.9.0-10.el9 Β· BSD
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms