lapacke_cgttrf_work.c(3)
πΈ NAME πΈ
lapacke_cgttrf_work.c β okay bestie, this is the manual page for that exact file, and the manual name is lapacke_cgttrf_work.c(3). We're keeping it cute but the facts are staying put π
β¨ SYNOPSIS β¨
#include 'lapacke_utils.h'
π Functions π
lapack_int LAPACKE_cgttrf_work (lapack_int n, lapack_complex_float *dl, lapack_complex_float *d, lapack_complex_float *du, lapack_complex_float *du2, lapack_int *ipiv)β the one function listed here, front and center π
π Function Documentation π
π¦ lapack_int LAPACKE_cgttrf_work (lapack_int n, lapack_complex_float * dl, lapack_complex_float * d, lapack_complex_float * du, lapack_complex_float * du2, lapack_int * ipiv)
Here's the exact signature from the docs, bestie β no cap, every type and pointer stays exactly as written:
lapack_int LAPACKE_cgttrf_work (lapack_int n, lapack_complex_float * dl, lapack_complex_float * d, lapack_complex_float * du, lapack_complex_float * du2, lapack_int * ipiv)
Definition at line 36 of file lapacke_cgttrf_work.c.
No parameter-by-parameter essay here, so I'm not gonna invent one β the original keeps it to the signature and that line number, and we keep every bit of that π―
π Author π
Generated automatically by Doxygen for LAPACK from the source code. So yes, Doxygen really said βI got thisβ and made the page for LAPACK off the source code π«Ά
That's the whole vibe check, bestie: LAPACK version 3.8.0, dated Tue Nov 14 2017, repping lapacke_cgttrf_work.c(3). Slay, stay safe, and may your pointers always point where you expect πβ¨
π¦ where this page comes from
- centos-stream 9: lapack 3.9.0-10.el9 Β· BSD
- centos-stream 9: lapack 3.9.0-10.el9 Β· BSD
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms