delete_module(2)
๐ delete_module(2) โ the "okay bestie let's unload a kernel module" page ๐
System Calls Manual โจ literally the manual for system calls, and this one is delete_module โ she unloads kernel modules. Yes, really.
๐ธ NAME ๐ธ
delete_module โ unload a kernel module. That's the whole gig. Bye bye module ๐
๐ LIBRARY ๐
Standard C library (libc, -lc). bestie pls note this does NOT mean you get a cute little wrapper function, keep reading ๐ซถ
โจ SYNOPSIS โจ
#include <fcntl.h> /* Definition of O_* constants */
#include <sys/syscall.h> /* Definition of SYS_* constants */
#include <unistd.h>
int syscall(SYS_delete_module, const char *name, unsigned int flags);
Note: glibc provides no wrapper fordelete_module(), which means you have to go throughsyscall(2). There is no shortcut. There is no cute littledelete_module(name, flags)call waiting for you. It's giving "you must do the ritual yourself" ๐ญ
๐ DESCRIPTION ๐
Okay so here's the tea. The delete_module() system call attempts to remove the unused loadable module entry identified by name. If the module has an exit function, then that function is executed before unloading the module. The flags argument is used to modify the behavior of the system call, as described below. This system call requires privilege โ so no, you can't just do this from your little unprivileged user shell, bestie ๐
Module removal is attempted according to the following rules:
- If there are other loaded modules that depend on (i.e., refer to symbols defined in) this module, then the call fails. ๐
- Otherwise, if the reference count for the module (i.e., the number of processes currently using the module) is zero, then the module is immediately unloaded. slay โจ
- If a module has a nonzero reference count, then the behavior depends on the bits set in flags. In normal usage (see NOTES), the
O_NONBLOCKflag is always specified, and theO_TRUNCflag may additionally be specified.
The various combinations for flags have the following effect:
flags == O_NONBLOCKโ The call returns immediately, with an error. not even gonna wait for you, she's outflags == (O_NONBLOCK | O_TRUNC)โ The module is unloaded immediately, regardless of whether it has a nonzero reference count. chaotic and powerful ๐ฅ(flags & O_NONBLOCK) == 0โ If flags does not specifyO_NONBLOCK, the following steps occur:- The module is marked so that no new references are permitted.
- If the module's reference count is nonzero, the caller is placed in an uninterruptible sleep state (
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) until the reference count is zero, at which point the call unblocks. ๐ด๐ - The module is unloaded in the usual way.
The O_TRUNC flag has one further effect on the rules described above. By default, if a module has an init function but no exit function, then an attempt to remove the module fails. However, if O_TRUNC was specified, this requirement is bypassed. the loophole of it all
โ ๏ธ Using theO_TRUNCflag is dangerous! If the kernel was not built withCONFIG_MODULE_FORCE_UNLOAD, this flag is silently ignored. (Normally,CONFIG_MODULE_FORCE_UNLOADis enabled.) Using this flag taints the kernel (TAINT_FORCED_RMMOD). ๐จ girl no. be careful.
๐ RETURN VALUE ๐
On success, zero is returned. On error, -1 is returned and errno is set to indicate the error. Standard behavior, iconic behavior, no notes ๐
๐ฆ ERRORS ๐ฆ
EBUSYโ The module is not "live" (i.e., it is still being initialized or is already marked for removal); or, the module has an init function but has no exit function, andO_TRUNCwas not specified in flags.EFAULTโ name refers to a location outside the process's accessible address space.ENOENTโ No module by that name exists. she's not here bestie, wrong nameEPERMโ The caller was not privileged (did not have theCAP_SYS_MODULEcapability), or module unloading is disabled (see/proc/sys/kernel/modules_disabledinproc(5)).EWOULDBLOCKโ Other modules depend on this module; or,O_NONBLOCKwas specified in flags, but the reference count of this module is nonzero andO_TRUNCwas not specified in flags. caught in 4k blocking
โญ STANDARDS โญ
Linux. Just Linux. That's it. ๐ง
๐ HISTORY ๐
The delete_module() system call is not supported by glibc. No declaration is provided in glibc headers, but, through a quirk of history, glibc versions before glibc 2.23 did export an ABI for this system call. Therefore, in order to employ this system call, it is (before glibc 2.23) sufficient to manually declare the interface in your code; alternatively, you can invoke the system call using syscall(2). the lore is real, iykyk ๐
๐ฐ๏ธ Linux 2.4 and earlier ๐ฐ๏ธ
In Linux 2.4 and earlier, the system call took only one argument:
int delete_module(const char *name);
If name is NULL, all unused modules marked auto-clean are removed. ๐ช๏ธ
Some further details of differences in the behavior of delete_module() in Linux 2.4 and earlier are not currently explained in this manual page. (yes, really, that's what it says โ the mystery stays a mystery ๐)
๐ง NOTES ๐ง
The uninterruptible sleep that may occur if O_NONBLOCK is omitted from flags is considered undesirable, because the sleeping process is left in an unkillable state. As at Linux 3.7, specifying O_NONBLOCK is optional, but in future kernels it is likely to become mandatory. so like, just pass it, bestie. future-proof your vibes โจ
๐ SEE ALSO ๐
and that's the whole page, you ate it, go unload something responsibly (or don't, it needs privilege anyway ๐ ) ๐
this lil masterpiece is from Linux man-pages 6.20, dated 2026-02-08, and yes it's literally called delete_module(2) โ she contains multitudes, mwah ๐ซถ๐
๐ฆ where this page comes from
- arch rolling: man-pages 6.20-1 ยท BSD-2-Clause AND BSD-3-Clause AND BSD-4.3TAHOE AND BSD-4-Clause-UC AND GPL-1.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-only AND GPL-2.0-or-later AND GPL-3.0-or-later AND LGPL-3.0-linking-exception AND LGPL-3.0-or-later AND LicenseRef-Public-Domain AND LicenseRef-UltraPermissive AND Linux-man-pages-1-para AND Linux-man-pages-copyleft AND Linux-man-pages-copyleft-2-para AND Linux-man-pages-copyleft-var AND MIT AND Spencer-94
- nixpkgs unstable: man-pages 6.20
- ๐ the page's license: Linux-man-pages-copyleft
- Copyright 2012, Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
- ๐ girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms