fedora-review-digest(1)
π fedora-review-digest β the manual page, but make it make sense π
okay bestie, gather round, because we're talking about fedora-review-digest(1) from the Sandogasa Manual and honestly? it's giving "I do one very specific thing and I do it flawlessly." β¨
β¨ NAME β¨
fedora-review-digest β condense a fedora-review run of an auto-generated spec into a review comment π«Ά
πΈ SYNOPSIS πΈ
[--no-net] [--post] [-h|--help] [-V|--version] [DIR-OR-BUGID]
[subcommands]
π¦ DESCRIPTION π¦
So here's the vibe: fedora-review-digest takes a fedora-review run of an auto-generated spec and condenses it down into a review comment. That's it. That's the whole gig. Condense a fedora-review run of an auto-generated spec into a review comment. Lowkey iconic, highkey useful. π
π OPTIONS π
-c,--comment <TEXT>β a reviewer note that sits above the review. The example given is"LGTM!"and honestly? valid. π-y,--yesβ accept the inferred checklist marks, no prompting, just trust the process. β¨--reviews-dir <DIR>β base directory used for the bug-id lookup. Default is.--no-netβ skip the crates.io latest-version check. offline queen behavior. π§--postβ post to Bugzilla: comment, review flag, claim. the full send. π₯-h,--helpβ print help-V,--versionβ print version[DIR-OR-BUGID]β either afedora-reviewresult dir, or a bug id living under--reviews-dirπ
π COMMANDS π
π fedora-review-digest config
Set up or verify the Bugzilla API key that --post needs. basically the "get your keys in order before the big night out" step πβ¨
-h,--helpβ print help
π fedora-review-digest run
[--mock-option] [--uniqueext] [--dry-run] [--no-digest] [-c|--comment]
[-y|--yes] [--reviews-dir] [--no-net] [--post] [-h|--help] <BUGID>
Run fedora-review on a bug, then digest the result. two-step slay. π
--copr <OWNER/PROJECT>β COPR(s) with staged deps, inowner/projectform. CSV is fine, pile 'em on. π¦--repo <URL>β extra repo baseurl(s) to build against. CSV ok here too.-m,--mock-config <NAME>β mock config, and it doubles as the COPR chroot name. multitasking queen. π--mock-option <OPT>β extra mock option(s), appended tofedora-review -o--uniqueext <TEXT>β unique mock buildroot suffix (that'smock --uniqueextbtw)--dry-runβ print thefedora-reviewcommand without running it. look, don't touch. π--no-digestβ stop after thefedora-reviewbuild and skip the digest entirely-c,--comment <TEXT>β reviewer note placed above the review ("LGTM!")-y,--yesβ accept inferred checklist marks without prompting--reviews-dir <DIR>β base directory for bug-id lookup. Default is.--no-netβ skip the crates.io latest-version check--postβ post to Bugzilla: comment, review flag, claim-h,--helpβ print help<BUGID>β review-request Bugzilla bug id (that'sfedora-review -bfor you) π
ngl bestie, if you're about to--post, go runfedora-review-digest configfirst so that Bugzilla API key is actually set up. do not come crying to me. π
and that's the page!! every flag, every default, every <BUGID> accounted for, nothing skipped, nothing invented. periodt. π
this has been fedora-review-digest(1) from sandogasa 0.27.0, dated 2026-10-21 β mwah, love u, go digest something beautiful β¨
π¦ where this page comes from
- fedora 43: sandogasa 0.27.0-2.fc43 Β· (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain AND Unicode-3.0 AND Apache-2.0 AND ISC AND MIT AND (Apache-2.0 OR BSL-1.0) AND (Apache-2.0 OR ISC OR MIT) AND (Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception OR Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND BSD-3-Clause AND MPL-2.0 AND (Unlicense OR MIT) AND Zlib
- fedora 44: sandogasa 0.27.0-2.fc44 Β· (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain AND Unicode-3.0 AND Apache-2.0 AND ISC AND MIT AND (Apache-2.0 OR BSL-1.0) AND (Apache-2.0 OR ISC OR MIT) AND (Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception OR Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND BSD-3-Clause AND MPL-2.0 AND (Unlicense OR MIT) AND Zlib
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms