PMAP_RELEASE(9)

πŸŽ€ PMAP_RELEASE β€” kernel dev manual, bestie edition πŸŽ€

okay so this is PMAP_RELEASE(9), from the Kernel Developer's Manual, and it's literally one of those tiny pages that does exactly one thing and does it flawlessly. no cap. let's get into it πŸ’–


✨ NAME ✨

pmap_release β€” release resources held by a physical map

like. that's it. that's the whole job. it lets go of stuff 🫢


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

first you gotta pull in the headers, obviously:

#include <sys/param.h>
#include <vm/vm.h>
#include <vm/pmap.h>

then the function itself, and she's giving absolutely no return value:

void
pmap_release(pmap_t pmap);

void return type, one argument, zero drama. main character energy tbh πŸ‘‘


✨ DESCRIPTION ✨

so pmap_release() releases any resources held by the physical map pmap. like, all of them. everything she was holding? gone. freed. bye πŸ’…

here's the lore tho: this function gets called when a pmap that was set up by the corresponding function, pmap_pinit(), is being released. so it's a matched set β€” pmap_pinit() builds it up, pmap_release() takes it all apart. they're a duo, fr fr. you don't call one without the other having done its thing πŸ¦‹


✨ IMPLEMENTATION NOTES ✨

⚠️ bestie. listen. this is important. this function should only be called if pmap no longer contains any valid mappings. that's not a suggestion, that's the rule. if there's still valid mappings chilling in there when you call this, you're not releasing a pmap, you're releasing a problem 😭

so: mappings cleared out first, then pmap_release(). order matters. periodt ✨


✨ SEE ALSO ✨

  • pmap(9) β€” the big one, go read her too
  • pmap_pinit(9) β€” the other half of the duo, the one that sets things up 🌸

✨ AUTHORS ✨

this manual page was written by Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>. thank you king, we appreciate you πŸ«ΆπŸ’œ


and that's the whole page!! short, sweet, extremely to the point. it's giving "one job, done correctly." obsessed. 🌈⭐

okay bye bestie β€” this one came from the Debian edition, dated July 21, 2003 (yes, she's vintage, and she's still iconic πŸ’–πŸ‘‘). mwah πŸ’…βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from