xe_sched_job...t_user_fence(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… xe_sched_job...t_user_fence(9) β€” the Kernel API Manual glow-up

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual page for xe_sched_job...t_user_fence(9) β€” yes that's the truncated name, that's how it is in the header, we're not fixing it, we're respecting it 🫢. This is a page 9 (kernel internals, iykyk) situation and it's lowkey a one-job wonder.


✨ NAME ✨

xe_sched_job_init_user_fence β€” Initialize user_fence for the job πŸ’–

Like, that's the whole assignment. It sets up the user fence for a job. Periodt.


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void xe_sched_job_init_user_fence (struct xe_sched_job *job , struct
xe_sync_entry *sync );

Not me pointing out that it returns void β€” it does its thing and it does not report back, she's mysterious like that πŸ’€. Two args, both pointers, both structs: struct xe_sched_job *job and struct xe_sync_entry *sync.


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • job β€” the job whose user_fence needs an init 🧚. She's the main character here, the one getting her fence initialized.
  • sync β€” the sync to be use to init user_fence ✨. Yeah, the original literally says "to be use" β€” quoting the vibe, not correcting the grammar, that's not my job, my job is facts πŸ’….
fr fr both of these are just pointers getting passed in β€” job gets the init, sync does the initializing. No cap.

πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

  • Kernel file ./drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c β€” go read the source bestie, it's all there πŸ“–
  • xe_sched_job_destroy(9) β€” the destroy counterpart, the whole circle of life moment 🌈

okay that's the page!! and for the cute sign-off: this lil beauty lives in ./drivers/gpu/drm/xe, it's dated October 2026, and it's filed under xe_sched_job...t_user_fence(9) ⭐ slay, go initialize some fences, ily, bye πŸ‘‘πŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from