xdp_rxq_inf...ch_mem_model(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… NAME πŸ’…

Okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual ✨ β€” this page is all about xdp_rxq_info_attach_mem_model, which attaches registered mem info to RxQ info πŸŽ€. Like, it's the function that hooks your already-registered memory info onto an RxQ info struct, and honestly? iconic behavior. No cap.


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

void xdp_rxq_info_attach_mem_model (struct xdp_rxq_info *xdp_rxq , const
       struct xdp_mem_info *mem );

That's the whole signature, bestie β€” void return, so like, no return value, no drama, she just does the thing and leaves πŸ’….


🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • xdp_rxq β€” the XDP RxQ info you're attaching the memory info to 🫢. Like, this is the destination, the main character receiving the glow-up.
  • mem β€” the memory info that's already registered ✨. Emphasis on already β€” you don't register it here, you just bring it. iykyk.

⭐ DESCRIPTION ⭐

So here's the tea β˜•: if the driver registers its memory providers manually, it has to use this function instead of xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model. Periodt. That's the rule, lowkey the whole point of the page.

Like, don't come at xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model with your manual-provider situation β€” that's not her job. Use xdp_rxq_info_attach_mem_model and everybody's happy πŸ’–.


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯


That's the whole page, bestie β€” no crumbs left behind πŸ’…βœ¨. This lil' beauty lives in ./include/net in the Kernel API Manual, dated October 2026, same title up top and down at the bottom (xdp_rxq_inf...ch_mem_model(9), yes the title itself got the ellipsis treatment, that's just how it is πŸ™ˆ). Byeee, go attach those memory models responsibly πŸ§šπŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from