usb4_switch...ing_possible(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… usb4_switch_lane_bonding_possible β€” a Kernel API Manual moment (section 9, bestie)

okay so first things first, the manual name is usb4_switch...ing_possible(9) β€” yes the truncation is part of the aesthetic, we don't question it, we just roll with it πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

usb4_switch_lane_bonding_possible β€” literally answers the question "are conditions met for lane bonding" 🫢


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

bool usb4_switch_lane_bonding_possible (struct tb_switch *sw );

πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

  • sw β€” the USB4 router. that's it, that's the argument, she's a whole USB4 router πŸ‘‘

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

So what she does is: she checks whether the conditions are met so that lane bonding can be established with the upstream router. vibe check for lane bonding, basically ✨

⚠️ okay this part matters bestie β€” call only for device routers. not host routers, not your random little side routers, device routers. periodt πŸ’…

πŸ”₯ RETURN πŸ”₯

  • true if lane bonding is possible πŸ‘‘
  • false otherwise πŸ’€

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

Kernel file ./drivers/thunderbolt/usb4.c and honestly the entire extended friend group:


okay that's the whole page, no cap, nothing skipped, every single function name preserved with her exact (9) crown on 🧚

signed off from ./drivers/thunderbolt, dated October 2026, living in the Kernel API Manual β€” mwah, go read some Thunderbolt source bestie πŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from