ufs_qcom_set..._40ns_cycles(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… ufs_qcom_set_clk_40ns_cycles β€” Kernel API Manual, section 9 πŸŽ€

okay so this is a page from the Kernel API Manual (section 9, the function-y one) and the function's full government name is ufs_qcom_set_clk_40ns_cycles, even though the page header is out here abbreviating it like ufs_qcom_set..._40ns_cycles(9). bestie, the header is just being shy. πŸ’…


✨ NAME ✨

ufs_qcom_set_clk_40ns_cycles β€” literally just Configure 40ns clk cycles. that's the whole job. it configures 40ns clock cycles. iconique, no notes. ⏱️


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

int ufs_qcom_set_clk_40ns_cycles (struct ufs_hba *hba , u32
cycles_in_1us );

that's it, that's the whole signature. returns an int, takes a struct ufs_hba * and a u32. clean. minimal. ate. 🫢


🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • hba β€” the host controller instance. like, the one. your main character struct. πŸ‘‘
  • cycles_in_1us β€” the number of cycles in 1us that's getting configured. that's the value you're handing over. no cap, that's literally it. πŸ“

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

so what does it actually do? it returns an error if the dme get/set configuration for 40ns fails, and it returns zero on success. that's the entire vibe check: zero = slay, error = not slay. 😭

ngl the whole function is basically a yes/no girlie β€” success or error, no in-between, no drama, just 0 or not 0. πŸŽ€

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

the kernel file lives at ./drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c, and these besties are all in the same friend group:


and that's the page!! πŸ’œ cute lil sign-off real quick: this one lives in ./drivers/ufs/host, it's dated October 2026, and it answers to ufs_qcom_set..._40ns_cycles(9) β€” the same abbreviated name as the top, we stay consistent in this house. 🌈⭐ go configure some cycles bestie, you got this πŸ§šπŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from