test_vfsuid...ntns_invalid(9)
π test_vfsuid...ntns_invalid(9) π
okay so this is a Kernel API Manual page, bestie β the manual name is literally right there in the header, we're not retyping it, we're living it β¨
πΈ NAME πΈ
test_vfsuid_root_in_currentns_invalid β it's the test that pokes vfsuid_root_in_currentns with an invalid vfsuid, and honestly? she's just checking that the answer comes back false. no cap. π
π¦ SYNOPSIS π¦
void test_vfsuid_root_in_currentns_invalid (struct kunit *test );
like, that's the whole signature. copy it exactly, she's sensitive π
β¨ ARGUMENTS β¨
testβ the KUnit test context π«Ά that's it, that's the whole vibe, one argument, main character energy
π DESCRIPTION π
so the whole point, the entire plot of this function, is verifying that an invalid vfsuid correctly returns false. that's it!! that's the test!! she shows up, hands over a bogus vfsuid, and makes sure the answer is a clean no π«β¨ literally the simplest little vibe check in the world and she ate
π₯ SEE ALSO π₯
- Kernel file
./security/commoncap_test.cπ go read the source, iykyk test_vfsuid_root_in_currentns_init_ns(9)test_vfsuid_root_in_currentns_nonzero(9)test_kuid_root_in_ns_init_ns_uid0(9)test_kuid_root_in_ns_init_ns_nonzero(9)create_test_user_ns_with_mapping(9)test_kuid_root_in_ns_with_mapping(9)test_kuid_root_in_ns_with_different_mappings(9)
the whole friend group fr fr π«Ά go say hi to all of them
ngl bestie this one's short and sweet β no warnings, no bugs, no exit statuses, just a tiny test doing her little thing π
and that's the page!! π sourced from ./security, dated October 2026 β mwah, go touch grass and then come back and read commoncap_test.c π§ββοΈβπ
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms