test_vfsuid...ntns_invalid(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… test_vfsuid...ntns_invalid(9) πŸ’…

okay so this is a Kernel API Manual page, bestie β€” the manual name is literally right there in the header, we're not retyping it, we're living it ✨


🌸 NAME 🌸

test_vfsuid_root_in_currentns_invalid β€” it's the test that pokes vfsuid_root_in_currentns with an invalid vfsuid, and honestly? she's just checking that the answer comes back false. no cap. πŸŽ€


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

void test_vfsuid_root_in_currentns_invalid (struct kunit *test );

like, that's the whole signature. copy it exactly, she's sensitive πŸ’…


✨ ARGUMENTS ✨

  • test β€” the KUnit test context 🫢 that's it, that's the whole vibe, one argument, main character energy

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

so the whole point, the entire plot of this function, is verifying that an invalid vfsuid correctly returns false. that's it!! that's the test!! she shows up, hands over a bogus vfsuid, and makes sure the answer is a clean no 🚫✨ literally the simplest little vibe check in the world and she ate


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

the whole friend group fr fr 🫢 go say hi to all of them


ngl bestie this one's short and sweet β€” no warnings, no bugs, no exit statuses, just a tiny test doing her little thing πŸ’œ

and that's the page!! πŸŽ€ sourced from ./security, dated October 2026 β€” mwah, go touch grass and then come back and read commoncap_test.c πŸ§šβ€β™€οΈβ­πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from