STRUCT ZFCP_DBF_HBA_RES(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ¦‹ struct zfcp_dbf_hba_res(9) πŸ¦‹

okay bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual page for struct zfcp_dbf_hba_res(9) β€” yes, the manual name is literally Kernel API Manual, and we are about to make this kernel struct make sense. No cap, this one is a whole little trace-record moment. πŸ’–


πŸŽ€ NAME πŸŽ€

struct zfcp_dbf_hba_res β€” trace record for hba responses. That's the name, that's the assignment, and it ate. Highkey iconic, fr fr. πŸ’…


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

here's the struct, bestie β€” do not come for the semicolons, they are correct:

struct zfcp_dbf_hba_res {
    u64 req_issued;
    u32 prot_status;
    u8 prot_status_qual[FSF_PROT_STATUS_QUAL_SIZE];
    u32 fsf_status;
    u8 fsf_status_qual[FSF_STATUS_QUALIFIER_SIZE];
    u32 port_handle;
    u32 lun_handle;
    u32 plogi_len;
    u32 prli_len;
};

🫢 Members 🫢

okay, member-by-member, because we are not skipping a single field. The way this struct is stacked... it's giving main character energy πŸ˜­πŸ‘‘ and I'm obsessed.

  • req_issued β€” timestamp when request was issued ⏰
  • prot_status β€” protocol status πŸ“‹
  • prot_status_qual β€” protocol status qualifier 🧾
  • fsf_status β€” fsf status πŸ’«
  • fsf_status_qual β€” fsf status qualifier πŸŽ€
  • port_handle β€” handle for port πŸ”Œ
  • lun_handle β€” handle for LUN πŸ’½
  • plogi_len β€” it's in the struct, but this page doesn't give it a description here; I'm not gonna invent one, bestie πŸ’€
  • prli_len β€” same situation: present in the struct, no description given here, and we don't make things up 🌸

πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

The references are giving group-chat energy, and yes, every single one is invited:


cute sign-off: this struct zfcp_dbf_hba_res(9) page is from ./drivers/s390/scsi and dated October 2026 β€” source/date footer vibes, and that's the whole manual page, bestie. Stay slay, read your structs, and remember: the vibe changes, the facts do not. πŸŽ€βœ¨πŸ¦‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from