STRUCT ETHTOOL_CMIS_CDB_RPL_HDR(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ NAME ✨

okay so bestie, this is the struct ethtool_cmis_cdb_rpl_hdr(9) page from the Kernel API Manual, and the NAME line is struct ethtool_cmis_cdb_rpl_hdr - CDB commands reply header arguments. It's giving tiny-header-struct energy, fr fr β€” I'm lowkey obsessed. πŸ’… No cap, this is the whole vibe.

🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

here's the fit, typed exactly:

struct ethtool_cmis_cdb_rpl_hdr {
    u8 rpl_len;
    u8 rpl_chk_code;
};

πŸ’… Members πŸ’…

  • rpl_len β€” Reply length. It's a u8, and it's literally giving reply-length realness, periodt. Slay.
  • rpl_chk_code β€” Reply check code. Also a u8, highkey the check-code member, no cap. Iconic.

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

go peek at these besties:

  • Kernel file ./net/ethtool/cmis.h
  • struct ethtool_cmis_cdb(9)
  • struct ethtool_cmis_cdb_request(9)
  • struct ethtool_cmis_cdb_cmd_args(9)
  • struct ethtool_cmis_cdb_rpl(9)

mwah πŸ’‹ source/version ./net/ethtool, dated October 2026, and it's the struct etht..._cdb_rpl_hdr(9) page β€” periodt. Later bestie, go read the kernel file and slay πŸ’–βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from