STRUCT DPNI_TAILDROP(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸŽ€ struct dpni_taildrop(9) πŸŽ€

okay bestie, so this is a page from the Kernel API Manual and it's literally all about one little struct called dpni_taildrop β€” the structure representing the taildrop. it's giving "small but important" energy and honestly? we love a focused icon. ✨


🌸 NAME 🌸

struct dpni_taildrop β€” the structure representing the taildrop. that's it, that's the whole vibe. 🫢


πŸ’… SYNOPSIS πŸ’…

here's the shape of it, exact as ever, no cap:

struct dpni_taildrop {
    char enable;
    enum dpni_congestion_unit units;
    u32 threshold;
 };

πŸ¦‹ Members πŸ¦‹

okay so let's go through the squad, one member at a time πŸ’–

  • enable β€” tells you whether the taildrop is active or not. is it on? is it off? this little char knows. πŸ‘‘
  • units β€” this one says what the unit of THRESHOLD is, type enum dpni_congestion_unit. here's the tea though: queue taildrop only supports byte units, so this field is literally ignored and assumed = 0 if CONGESTION_POINT is 0. ngl, it's a decoration in that case πŸ™ˆ
  • threshold β€” the threshold value itself, a u32, measured in the units identified by the UNITS field. and listen β€” value 0 cannot be used as a valid taildrop threshold, so THRESHOLD must be > 0 if the taildrop is enabled. that's a hard rule, fr fr, no 0 shenanigans allowed πŸ’€

⭐ SEE ALSO ⭐

the whole extended friend group, and yes we're tagging everyone because they all slay in their own way 🌈


πŸ’‘ tiny reminder bestie: THRESHOLD of 0 is not a valid threshold, so don't try it even if the vibe seems right πŸ™…β€β™€οΈ

and that's the whole page, periodt. source path was cutely truncated as ./drivers/net/ethernet/freesca..., dated October 2026, and this was struct dpni_taildrop(9) β€” go off, kernel docs, you ate. πŸ”₯πŸ‘‘πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from