stm32_firew...access_by_id(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… stm32_firewall_release_access_by_id πŸ’…

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual β€” yes we're literally reading kernel docs together, this is our bonding time 🫢 and today's main character is stm32_firewall_release_access_by_id, an icon, a legend, the undo button of firewall access ✨


🌸 NAME 🌸

stm32_firewall_release_access_by_id β€” she releases the access that was granted by a call to stm32_firewall_grant_access_by_id(). that's it, that's the vibe. you granted it, now you're giving it back, closure era πŸ’–


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

void stm32_firewall_release_access_by_id (struct stm32_firewall
       *firewall , u32 subsystem_id );

like, no return value, she just does it and leaves. no notes. πŸ‘‘


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • firewall β€” the firewall reference that contains the firewall controller. your lil handle on the whole situation, keep it close πŸ¦‹
  • subsystem_id β€” the firewall ID of the subsystem resource. the specific one you're cleaning up after πŸ’…

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

okay so real talk, warnings first because we care about you babes:

⚠️ there is no way to ensure that the given ID will correspond to the firewall referenced in the device node if the ID did not come from stm32_firewall_get_firewall. so if your ID came from somewhere else, this function must be used with caution β€” like, proceed but carefully, eyes open, iykyk 😭

this function should be used for subsystem resources that do not have the same firewall ID as their parent. that's her whole niche, her purpose, her moment 🌟

and heads up: U32_MAX is an invalid ID. not valid. do not pass it. it's giving "please don't" energy πŸ’€


πŸ‘€ SEE ALSO πŸ‘€

go read these too bestie, they're all in the same friend group:


and that's the tea πŸ“ this page lives in ./include/linux/bus, dated October 2026 β€” mwah, love u, go release some access responsibly πŸ’œβœ¨πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from