sci_remote_n...t_node_index(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… sci_remote_n...t_node_index(9) β€” from the Kernel API Manual, bestie πŸŽ€

okay so first thing, the title got cut off mid-word up top (it's giving ctrl-c energy 😭) β€” the real name is sci_remote_node_table_set_node_index, and yes it lives in the Kernel API Manual, section 9. buckle up, this one's short but it's a whole mood πŸ¦‹


✨ NAME ✨

sci_remote_node_table_set_node_index β€” (the description is literally blank in the original, so no, you're not missing lore, there's just nothing there πŸ™ˆ)


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void sci_remote_node_table_set_node_index (struct sci_remote_node_table
     *remote_node_table , u32 remote_node_index );

literally copy that exactly, spaces and all, no cap πŸ’…


🫢 ARGUMENTS 🫢

  • remote_node_table β€” this is the remote node table you're messing with, specifically the one where remote node availability lives. it's the what are we even editing of it all ✨
  • remote_node_index β€” this is the remote node index you're handing back to the table. it's the who if the table's the where πŸŽ€

πŸ‘‘ DESCRIPTION πŸ‘‘

okay so here's the tea: this method sets the remote to available in the remote node allocation table πŸ”₯ that's the whole personality. then the original page just says none. iconic of it. truly nothing further, your honor πŸ’€

lowkey important: it's setting it to available, like returning the vibe to the pool. don't overthink it, the manpage sure didn't 😌

🧚 SEE ALSO 🧚

the whole friend group, mwah πŸ’–:


that's the whole page, bestie β€” go forth and return your remote node indices πŸ¦‹

sign-off szn πŸŽ€: this one came from ./drivers/scsi/isci, dated October 2026, and it's the sci_remote_n...t_node_index(9) page (yes, still truncated, we love a consistent queen). mwah, study well, iykyk πŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from