rproc_cored...ing_sections(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… rproc_coredump_using_sections β€” the Kernel API Manual, section 9, bestie

Okay so real talk, this one lives in the Kernel API Manual, section 9, and its whole name is literally rproc_coredump_using_sections. Say that five times fast, I dare you. 🫢


✨ NAME ✨

rproc_coredump_using_sections β€” perform coredump using section headers. That's it, that's the vibe. πŸ’–


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void rproc_coredump_using_sections(struct rproc *rproc);

Iconic. No return value. It just does the thing. ✨


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • rproc β€” the rproc handle. That's your little main character right there, the thing you're passing in. πŸ¦‹

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

So here's what's happening, bestie, listen up. πŸ‘‘

This function will generate an ELF header for the registered sections of segments β€” yes, an actual ELF header, she's fancy β€” and create a devcoredump device associated with rproc.

Then it gets interesting, because there are two paths depending on the coredump configuration:

  • It will directly copy the segments from device memory to userspace, OR
  • It will copy segments from device memory to a separate buffer, which can then be read by userspace.

And here's the tradeoff, no cap: the first approach avoids using extra vmalloc memory. But β€” and this is the part you need to remember β€” it will stall recovery flow until the dump is read by userspace. 😭 So like, it's cheaper on memory but it just sits there waiting. Pick your fighter. πŸ’€


πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

Go read them, they're all in the same friend group. πŸ’œ


Okay that's the whole page, mwah. 🌈 This one came from the ./drivers/remoteproc corner of the world, dated October 2026, and it's filed under rproc_cored...ing_sections(9) β€” yes the name is truncated in the footer, she's mysterious like that. πŸŽ€ Slay, goodbye! πŸ’…

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from