rdtgroup_cb...seudo_locked(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

🌸 NAME 🌸

Okay bestie, welcome to the rdtgroup_cb...seudo_locked(9) page from the Kernel API Manual β€” we're doing kernel API lore today and it's lowkey iconic βœ¨πŸ’…

rdtgroup_cbm_overlaps_pseudo_locked β€” Test if CBM or portion is pseudo-locked. That's the whole name, no cap πŸŽ€


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

Look at this signature, bestie:

bool rdtgroup_cbm_overlaps_pseudo_locked (struct rdt_ctrl_domain *d ,
unsigned long cbm );

🫢 ARGUMENTS 🫢

Here's the cast of characters:

  • d β€” RDT domain. The domain in question, periodt.
  • cbm β€” CBM to test. Literally the bitmask under the vibe check.

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

K so d represents a cache instance, and cbm is a capacity bitmask that is considered for it. The quest: determine if cbm overlaps with any existing pseudo-locked region on d. ✨

Important little detail, fr fr: cbm is unsigned long, even if only 32 bits are used, to make the bitmap functions work correctly. That's not me being extra; that's literally the reason πŸ’…


πŸ¦‹ RETURN πŸ¦‹

true if cbm overlaps with pseudo-locked region on d, false otherwise. Periodt. πŸ’–


πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

The kernel file is ./fs/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c, and here's the whole SEE ALSO squad, no one left behind:


That's the page, bestie! Source/version: ./fs/resctrl; date: October 2026; page title: rdtgroup_cb...seudo_locked(9). Mwah πŸ’‹πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from