radeon_fence...r_start_ring(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– NAME πŸ’–

radeon_fence_driver_start_ring β€” bestie, this is the one that makes the fence driver ready for use on the ring you asked for ✨

Quick vibe check first: this page lives in the Kernel API Manual, and it's giving "low-level radeon GPU internals, but make it cute" πŸ¦‹


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int radeon_fence_driver_start_ring (struct radeon_device *rdev , int ring );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • rdev β€” the radeon device pointer, aka your main character 🫢
  • ring β€” the ring index you wanna start the fence driver on, no cap πŸ’…

✨ DESCRIPTION ✨

Okay so here's the tea β˜•: this function gets the fence driver ready for processing β€” and like, on all asics, periodt πŸ’―.

But not every asic has every ring, right? So obviously each asic is only gonna start the fence driver on the rings it actually has πŸ™ˆ β€” nobody's out here starting drivers on rings that don't exist, that's not the vibe.

It returns 0 for success, and returns errors for failure 😭 (so like, check your return value, bestie, fr fr).


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

The source lives in the kernel file ./drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c β€” go binge it, it's iconic πŸ‘‘

Also the whole fence friend group πŸ’œ:


Lowkey mandatory: read the fence family before you touch anything β€” iykyk 🧚

And that's the whole page, bestie 🌈. Shoutout to ./drivers/gpu/drm/radeon for the source, October 2026 for the date, and the Kernel API Manual for hosting this absolute gem πŸ’– Slay, and remember: start the fence driver only on the rings your asic actually has. Periodt. πŸ‘‘

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from