queue_limits...ck_integrity(9)

📦 version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

🌸 queue_limits_stack_integrity — like, the stacking of the integrity profile, bestie 🌸

okay so real talk, this one lives in the Kernel API Manual and it's a bool function, so she's giving very much yes-or-no main character energy. Let's get into it ✨

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

bool queue_limits_stack_integrity (struct queue_limits *t , struct queue_limits *b );

like literally that's the whole vibe. two pointers, one bool, zero drama 💅

🎀 ARGUMENTS 🎀

  • t — the target queue limits 🎯 like where we're trying to stack stuff into
  • b — the base queue limits 🧱 the source of the integrity tea

🦋 DESCRIPTION 🦋

okay so what she actually does: she checks whether the integrity profile sitting in b can be stacked into the target t. and ngl, stacking is possible if either of these two moods is happening:

a) t does not have any integrity information stacked into it yet — like a clean slate, a fresh notebook, untouched 🫶 b) the integrity profile in b is identical to the one in t — same energy, matching fits, no cap 👑

if b can be stacked into t, she returns true. slay. 🎉

but if it can't? she returns false and clears the integrity information in t 😭 so like, heads up — this function has consequences, it's not just vibes and a return value. the target gets wiped of its integrity info on the way out. periodt.

fr fr though — that "clear the integrity information in t" part is real. don't sleep on it 💀

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

kernel file ./block/blk-settings.c, plus the whole friend group:

go read them, they're iconic too, iykyk 📚✨

🫶 and that's the page!! this one came out of ./block, dated October 2026, and yeah the man page name is like queue_limits...ck_integrity(9) in the header/footer because apparently we're abbreviating now 🙈 anyway love u, bye bestie 💖🎀🦋

📦 where this page comes from