proc_therma...r_floor_intr(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ‘‘ proc_thermal_check_power_floor_intr β€” like, the whole vibe

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual ✨ this one's a lil function with a very long name and honestly it ate πŸ’… it's proc_thermal_check_power_floor_intr and it literally just checks on a power floor interrupt. that's it. that's the whole gig. no cap πŸŽ€


🌸 NAME 🌸

proc_thermal_check_power_floor_intr β€” check power floor interrupt πŸ”₯

like, is the interrupt active or nah? this function knows πŸ‘€


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

bool proc_thermal_check_power_floor_intr (struct proc_thermal_device
*proc_priv );

yes the signature is that long, she's highkey a main character πŸ’œ


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • proc_priv β€” Processor thermal device instance. that's your thermal device bestie, the one you're checking up on 🫢

πŸ’… DESCRIPTION πŸ’…

so this is a callback β€” a little function that someone else calls back to β€” and its whole job is to check if the interrupt for the power floor is active ⭐

the way that it just... checks. and reports back. iconic behavior honestly 🌈


🧚 CONTEXT 🧚

Called from interrupt context πŸ’€ so like, be normal about it, you're in interrupt land, no sleeping on the job πŸ™ˆ


⭐ RETURN ⭐

  • true β€” power floor is active πŸ”₯
  • false β€” when it's not active πŸ’€

that's the whole vibe check, periodt πŸ‘‘


πŸ“ SEE ALSO πŸ“

  • Kernel file ./drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_power_floor.c β€” go read the source bestie, iykyk πŸ“–
  • proc_thermal_power_floor_intr_callback(9) β€” her sibling callback, love that for her πŸ’–

and that's the page!! 🌸 source: ./drivers/thermal/intel/int340... β€” dated October 2026, living under proc_therma...r_floor_intr(9) πŸŽ€ mwah, go check that interrupt bestie πŸ’…βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from