omap_control_init(9)
β¨ NAME β¨
omap_control_init β the low level init for the control driver, bestie π
So this is a page from the Kernel API Manual, and it's about exactly one function. Short page, iconic energy, let's go π
β¨ SYNOPSIS β¨
int omap_control_init (void );
That's it. That's the whole call. No args, just vibes β¨
β¨ ARGUMENTS β¨
voidβ no arguments. Literally none. She takes nothing, she needs nothing, she is complete on her own π«Ά
β¨ DESCRIPTION β¨
Okay so here's the tea β β omap_control_init does the low level clock infrastructure initialization for the control driver. That's the whole job. No cap.
And the return situation:
- returns
0on success π β slay, we love a clean zero - returns a negative error value on failure π β so if you see a negative number coming back, that's your sign something went sideways. Check it, fr fr. Don't just ignore it and hope. π
Heads up bestie: this page only tells you that it initializes the low level clock infrastructure for the control driver and that it returns 0 or a negative error value. It does not spill any more details, and neither will I β no inventing lore π
β¨ SEE ALSO β¨
The kernel file being referenced here is:
./arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c
And the whole friend group of related functions, all of them, in order π:
omap3_ctrl_write_boot_mode(9)omap3_ctrl_save_padconf(9)omap3_ctrl_set_iva_bootmode_idle(9)omap3_ctrl_setup_d2d_padconf(9)omap3_ctrl_init(9)am43xx_control_save_context(9)am43xx_control_restore_context(9)omap2_control_base_init(9)
Go read those if you want the full cinematic universe π iykyk
okay that's the whole page, mwah π β this came out of ./arch/arm/mach-omap2, dated October 2026, and yes the section number on the tin is (9) because it's a kernel API page. periodt. π
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms