nlm_svc_dec...m_notifyargs(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… nlm_svc_dec...m_notifyargs(9) πŸ’…

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual β€” yes, that's the manual name, we're fancy like that ✨. Today's main character is nlm_svc_decode_nlm_notifyargs, and honestly? She's a little decoder who just wants to know if your notify args are valid. Let's get into it πŸŽ€


🌸 NAME 🌸

nlm_svc_decode_nlm_notifyargs β€” Decode a nlm_notifyargs argument

Like, that's literally her whole job. Decode the thing. Slay πŸ’…


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

bool nlm_svc_decode_nlm_notifyargs (struct svc_rqst *rqstp , struct
xdr_stream *xdr );

She takes two things and returns a bool. Simple. Elegant. Iconic 🫢


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • rqstp β€” the RPC transaction context. Think of it as the group chat where this whole RPC conversation is happening πŸ’¬
  • xdr β€” the source XDR data stream. This is where the actual bytes live, and she's gonna read from it πŸ‘€

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

Okay so here's the vibe check on return values, and I need you to memorize this bestie because it's the whole point:

  • true β€” procedure arguments decoded successfully πŸŽ‰ ate and left no crumbs
  • false β€” decode failed 😭 it's giving error, it's giving invalid

That's it. That's the description. No cap, that's all she wrote. She decodes, she tells you if it worked, she moves on. Queen behavior πŸ‘‘πŸ’œ


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

This is the friend group, and you WILL be introduced to all of them, no skipping πŸ™ˆ:

Look at that roster. The decoders AND the encoders. It's giving balanced energy βš–οΈπŸŒΈ


πŸ’€ friendly reminder bestie: true means it worked, false means it didn't. Don't flip them. I'm watching. 🫢

okay that's the whole page, you're officially educated πŸŽ“πŸ’– β€” this gem lives in ./fs/lockd, and it's dated October 2026. See you in the next manpage, mwah πŸ“πŸ§šβ€β™€οΈβœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from