nfs_inode_a...mp_monotonic(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸŽ€ NAME πŸŽ€

nfs_inode_attrs_cmp_monotonic β€” compare attributes. Okay bestie, this is the Kernel API Manual page for that exact function, and we're about to vibe-check some NFS attributes πŸ’…βœ¨


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int nfs_inode_attrs_cmp_monotonic (const struct nfs_fattr *fattr , const
       struct inode *inode );

πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

  • fattr β€” attributes πŸŽ€
  • inode β€” pointer to inode πŸ¦‹

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

Okay so picture this: the function is literally trying to divine whether or not an RPC call reply carrying stale attributes got scheduled after another call carrying updated ones πŸ‘€

The whole vibe rests on one assumption: we assume that the server observes monotonic semantics for the change attribute. So a larger value means that the attributes in fattr are more recent β€” and in that case the function returns the value '1' πŸŽ‰. A return value of '0' indicates no measurable change. A return value of '-1' means that the attributes in inode are more recent. That's the whole ranking, no cap πŸ’―


πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

Kernel file: ./fs/nfs/inode.c β€” and here's the whole friend group:


This page's source is ./fs/nfs, and it's dated October 2026, for nfs_inode_a...mp_monotonic(9) β€” bye bestie, go compare those attributes responsibly πŸ«ΆπŸ’‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from