nfs_inode_a...mp_monotonic(9)
π NAME π
nfs_inode_attrs_cmp_monotonic β compare attributes. Okay bestie, this is the Kernel API Manual page for that exact function, and we're about to vibe-check some NFS attributes π
β¨
β¨ SYNOPSIS β¨
int nfs_inode_attrs_cmp_monotonic (const struct nfs_fattr *fattr , const
struct inode *inode );
π ARGUMENTS π
fattrβ attributes πinodeβ pointer to inode π¦
π₯ DESCRIPTION π₯
Okay so picture this: the function is literally trying to divine whether or not an RPC call reply carrying stale attributes got scheduled after another call carrying updated ones π
The whole vibe rests on one assumption: we assume that the server observes monotonic semantics for the change attribute. So a larger value means that the attributes in fattr are more recent β and in that case the function returns the value '1' π. A return value of '0' indicates no measurable change. A return value of '-1' means that the attributes in inode are more recent. That's the whole ranking, no cap π―
π SEE ALSO π
Kernel file: ./fs/nfs/inode.c β and here's the whole friend group:
nfs_sync_mapping(9)nfs_vmtruncate(9)nfs_setattr_update_inode(9)nfs_close_context(9)nfs_revalidate_inode(9)nfs_clear_invalid_mapping(9)nfs_revalidate_mapping(9)nfs_check_inode_attributes(9)nfs_fattr_set_barrier(9)nfs_inode_attrs_cmp_generic(9)nfs_inode_attrs_cmp_strict_monotonic(9)nfs_inode_attrs_cmp(9)nfs_inode_finish_partial_attr_update(9)nfs_refresh_inode(9)nfs_post_op_update_inode(9)nfs_post_op_update_inode_force_wcc_locked(9)nfs_post_op_update_inode_force_wcc(9)
This page's source is ./fs/nfs, and it's dated October 2026, for nfs_inode_a...mp_monotonic(9) β bye bestie, go compare those attributes responsibly π«Άπ
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms