nand_ecc_is_strong_enough(9)
β¨ NAME β¨
nand_ecc_is_strong_enough β okay so this one literally just checks whether your chip configuration actually meets the datasheet requirements π
(yes, that's the whole vibe, and it's a Kernel API Manual moment, bestie π«Ά)
π¦ SYNOPSIS π¦
bool nand_ecc_is_strong_enough (struct nand_device *nand );
πΈ ARGUMENTS πΈ
nandβ the device you wanna check, no cap π
π DESCRIPTION π
So here's the tea β β if our configuration corrects A bits per B bytes, and the minimum required correction level is X bits per Y bytes, then we gotta make sure both of these are true, periodt:
A / B >= X / YA >= X
Requirement (1) is the one that ensures we can correct for the required bitflip density β¨
Requirement (2) is the glow-up that ensures we can correct even when all the bitflips get clumped together in the same sector π like they're all showing up to the same party π
Both conditions, bestie. Not one, not the other. Both. The vibe check fails if even one of them is off π
π SEE ALSO π
Kernel file ./drivers/mtd/nand/ecc.c β go read it, iykyk π
And that's the whole page, mwah π β brought to you by ./drivers/mtd/nand and dated October 2026, which is basically the most iconic little sign-off ever π§ββοΈβ take care of your ECC and it'll take care of you π¦π
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms