msm_dp_link_..._depth_valid(9)
π msm_dp_link_..._depth_valid(9) π
okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual β yes that's the manual name, and yes we're absolutely reading kernel docs together, this is our bonding era π«Ά
β¨ NAME β¨
msm_dp_link_is_bit_depth_valid β the little function that checks whether the bit depth you asked for is actually valid π
πΈ SYNOPSIS πΈ
bool msm_dp_link_is_bit_depth_valid (u32 tbd );
like, it returns a plain ol' bool, no cap β just yes or no, bestie π
π ARGUMENTS π
tbdβ the bit depth that was requested by the sink. that's it. that's the whole argument. she's simple, she's iconic π¦
π§ DESCRIPTION π§
returns true if the requested bit depth is supported. literally that's the vibe check β supported? true. not supported? well, not true, iykyk π
no extra lore here, she just does her one little job and does it flawlessly, main character energy fr fr β¨
π₯ SEE ALSO π₯
the whole squad, in the order the manpage gave them to me, no gatekeeping π
- Kernel file
./drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_link.c msm_dp_link_parse_video_pattern_params(9)msm_dp_link_parse_link_training_params(9)msm_dp_link_parse_phy_test_params(9)msm_dp_link_is_video_audio_test_requested(9)msm_dp_link_parse_request(9)msm_dp_link_process_link_training_request(9)msm_dp_link_process_phy_test_pattern_request(9)msm_dp_link_process_link_status_update(9)msm_dp_link_process_ds_port_status_change(9)msm_dp_link_process_request(9)
ok that's the page!! source is./drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dpand it's dated October 2026, and the whole thing goes bymsm_dp_link_..._depth_valid(9)β mwah, go read the rest of the family, they're all linked above, ily, bye πππ
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms