mlx5_sriov_...ier_register(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸŽ€ mlx5_sriov_...ier_register(9) πŸŽ€

okay so bestie, we're in the Kernel API Manual today and this page is literally about registering a VF notification block chain. yes it's a mouthful, no we're not scared of it πŸ’…


✨ NAME ✨

mlx5_sriov_blocking_notifier_register β€” registers a VF notification block chain πŸ¦‹

like... that's the whole name. it's giving long but iconic.


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int mlx5_sriov_blocking_notifier_register (struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev ,
       int vf_id , struct notifier_block *nb );

three args, one int back. simple. clean. we love a signature that doesn't play games πŸ’–


🫢 ARGUMENTS 🫢

  • mdev β€” the mlx5 core device, aka the main character here πŸ‘‘
  • vf_id β€” the VF id. yes literally just the VF id, that's the whole vibe πŸŽ€
  • nb β€” the notifier block that gets called whenever VF events happen. it's the one on call, lowkey always ready πŸ“ž

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

returns 0 on success, or an error code. that's it, that's the tea β˜• ngl sometimes the manpage is short and that's fine, we respect the brevity era.

so like β€” if you get 0, slay, you're registered. anything else? that's an error code bestie, go check it πŸ™ˆ

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

  • kernel file ./drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/sriov.c β€” go read the source, it ate πŸ’…
  • mlx5_sriov_blocking_notifier_unregister(9) β€” the cleanup arc, because everything you register must eventually be unregistered, periodt πŸ¦‹

⭐ reminder that this is the blocking notifier register β€” the name says blocking, so take it at its word, fr fr.

and that's the page!! mwah πŸ’œ

sign-off time: this one came from ./drivers/net/ethernet/mellano... and it's dated October 2026, and the header/footer both rep mlx5_sriov_...ier_register(9) β€” okay bye bestie, drink some water πŸ“βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from