madvise_rang...invalidation(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ NAME ✨

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual β€” this is the madvise_rang...invalidation(9) page, and we're about to make madvise_range_needs_invalidation make sense. it's giving β€œcheck whether madvise needs invalidation” and honestly? iconic little helper energy πŸ’…

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

the whole signature is right here, no cap:

bool madvise_range_needs_invalidation (const struct drm_xe_madvise *args
       );

🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • args β€” the madvise ioctl arguments. yes bestie, that's the whole argument list. slay.

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

okay so purgeable state updates are lowkey chill: they only touch the VMA/BO metadata. the PTEs stay valid, and they get zapped only if the BO is later purged. that's the whole tea β˜• β€” no early PTE zapping happening here.

so this function is literally doing the vibe check on whether the update needs PTE invalidation. periodt.

πŸŽ€ RETURN πŸŽ€

you get true when the update needs PTE invalidation. that's the result, bestie βœ…

πŸ’œ SEE ALSO πŸ’œ

go sip some more tea in these:


mwah πŸ’‹ β€” signed off from the ./drivers/gpu/drm/xe corner of the source tree, October 2026, on the madvise_rang...invalidation(9) page. stay zappy, bestie 🫢✨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from