lpfc_unreg_did(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… lpfc_unreg_did β€” a Kernel API Manual moment

okay bestie, so this is a page straight out of the Kernel API Manual, and honestly? it's giving "small function, big job." let's get into it ✨


🌸 NAME 🌸

lpfc_unreg_did β€” prepare a mailbox command for unregistering DID πŸŽ€


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

void lpfc_unreg_did (struct lpfc_hba * phba , uint16_t vpi , uint32_t
did , LPFC_MBOXQ_t * pmb );

like… yes, that's a void. it doesn't return anything. it just does the thing and dips. πŸ’… periodt.


✨ ARGUMENTS ✨

  • phba β€” pointer to lpfc hba data structure. it's the main character, obviously 🫢
  • vpi β€” virtual N_Port identifier πŸ¦‹
  • did β€” remote port identifier πŸ‘‘
  • pmb β€” pointer to the driver internal queue element for mailbox command πŸ“¬

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

so the unregister DID mailbox command is used to unregister an N_Port/F_Port login for an unknown RPI by specifying the DID of a remote port. no cap, that's what it does.

lowkey the important bit: this command frees an RPI context in the HBA port. and that has the effect of performing an implicit N_Port/F_Port logout. so like… it's not just cleanup, it's a whole logout wearing a disguise 😭

and what this routine itself does? it prepares the mailbox command for unregistering a remote N_Port/F_Port (DID) login. prep girlie. it sets it up, it doesn't send it. πŸ’–

no return value, no error codes on this one β€” it's a void, so there's literally nothing to check. the pmb you handed it carries the story from here 🫢

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

this list is long and honestly kind of iconic β€” look at it go:

Kernel file ./drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_mbox.c

like, that's a whole friend group right there πŸ’€ but slay, they're all relevant.


and that's the page bestie πŸŽ€ the whole thing lives over in ./drivers/scsi/lpfc, and it's dated October 2026 β€” so yeah, future-dated manpage, main character energy fr fr. go unregister that DID, iykyk πŸ’œπŸ¦‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from