irq_set_chip..._name_locked(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… irq_set_chip..._name_locked(9) β€” from the Kernel API Manual, bestie ✨

okay so this is irq_set_chip_handler_name_locked, straight out of the Linux Kernel API Manual, and honestly? she's a little power move. let me put you on 🫢


✨ NAME ✨

irq_set_chip_handler_name_locked β€” literally "set chip, handler and name from a locked region" πŸ’– that's the whole job, no cap.


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void irq_set_chip_handler_name_locked (struct irq_data *data , const
       struct irq_chip *chip , irq_flow_handler_t handler , const char *name );

like, yes, she returns void. she gives nothing back because she's already given everything. icon behavior πŸ’…


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • data β€” pointer to the irq_data structure for which the chip is set. this is the main character of the whole operation, fr.
  • chip β€” pointer to the new irq chip. the glow-up in question ✨
  • handler β€” flow control handler function for this interrupt. she handles the flow, iykyk.
  • name β€” name of the interrupt. yes bestie she gets a name, we love a labeled queen πŸ‘‘

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

so what she actually does: she replaces the irq chip at the proper hierarchy level in data, and sets the handler and name in the associated irq descriptor. that's three things at once. multitasking icon πŸ’€πŸ”₯

⚠️ okay this part is serious though: must be called with irq_desc locked and valid parameters. not optional, not a suggestion. locked region or bust. no cap. πŸ™ˆ

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

  • the kernel file ./include/linux/irqdesc.h
  • struct irqstat(9)
  • struct irq_redirect(9)
  • struct irq_desc(9)
  • irq_set_handler_locked(9) β€” her sister, also slaying ✨

and that's the whole vibe check, bestie πŸ“ this came to you from ./include/linux, dated October 2026, filed under irq_set_chip..._name_locked(9) β€” mwah, go forth and lock your irq_desc πŸ’œπŸ§šβ€β™€οΈ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from