ice_vsi_ini...ted_vlan_ops(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… ice_vsi_init_unsupported_vlan_ops πŸ’…

okay so this is a page straight out of the Kernel API Manual bestie, and honestly? it's a short one but it's doing exactly what it needs to do. no notes. 🫢


✨ NAME ✨

ice_vsi_init_unsupported_vlan_ops β€” literally just sets all the VSI VLAN ops to "unsupported", that's the whole job πŸ’–


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void ice_vsi_init_unsupported_vlan_ops(struct ice_vsi *vsi);

πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • vsi β€” the VSI you're initializing, and yeah we're setting its VSI VLAN ops to unsupported. that's the vibe check happening here πŸŽ€

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

so here's the tea: by default, all the inner and outer VSI VLAN ops return -EOPNOTSUPP. every single one. πŸ’€

and the reason they did it this way β€” instead of just leaving the ops null β€” is to prevent unexpected crashes. like, not me leaving a null pointer hanging around, that's giving main character energy in the worst way possible 😭. so instead, if somebody calls an unsupported VSI VLAN op, it just politely returns -EOPNOTSUPP and everyone moves on with their lives. slay. ✨

no cap, this is the safe-girl-boss approach to function pointers: never leave 'em null, give 'em a default answer. πŸ‘‘

πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

go read those next, iykyk 🧚


aaaand that's the page fr fr 🌈 β€” brought to you by ./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice, dated October 2026, same header name ice_vsi_ini...ted_vlan_ops(9) on both ends because symmetry ate πŸ’…πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from