ice_should_r..._sq_send_cmd(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– ice_should_r..._sq_send_cmd(9) β€” Kernel API Manual πŸ’–


πŸ’… NAME πŸ’…

ice_should_retry_sq_send_cmd β€” that's the function name, bestie (and yes, the original NAME line has a little trailing dash with no blurb after it; it's just vibing there, no cap).


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

bool ice_should_retry_sq_send_cmd (u16 opcode );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • opcode β€” an AQ opcode. That's the whole argument description, bestie: it's the opcode you're checking. 🫢

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

Okay so this one is lowkey a tiny decision-maker: it decides whether we should retry the send command routine for the ATQ, depending on the opcode. That's it. That's the whole vibe. Opcode in, retry decision out β€” very main character energy for a little helper. ✨

No extra behavior is described in the original, so I'm not out here inventing any. Periodt. πŸ’…

🌸 SEE ALSO 🌸

Kernel file: ./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_common.c

Go read these too, bestie β€” the whole ice friend group is here:


Kissies and kernel hugs 🫢 β€” this page is from ./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice, October 2026, and it's giving ice_should_r..._sq_send_cmd(9) energy. Bye bestie! πŸ’–βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from