ibmveth_remo...om_pool_test(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… NAME πŸ’…

ok so bestie, welcome to the glow-up of ibmveth_remove_buffer_from_pool_test β€” it's a unit test for some of the stuff that ibmveth_remove_buffer_from_pool does. yes, "some", they said it, not me 😭

this one lives in the kernel API manual, section 9, and the page title is literally so long it got chopped to ibmveth_remo...om_pool_test(9) in the header πŸ’€ iconic behaviour honestly.


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

void ibmveth_remove_buffer_from_pool_test (struct kunit *test );

that's it. that's the whole vibe. no return value, no drama, just a void and a pointer 🫢


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • test β€” a pointer to the kunit structure. that's the whole assignment bestie, hand it the kunit struct and let it cook πŸ“

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

okay so here's the tea β˜• β€” this test is all about the error returns from ibmveth_remove_buffer_from_pool. like, does it properly bail when things go wrong? that's what we're checking.

but here's the part you CANNOT skip, bestie: ibmveth_remove_buffer_from_pool also calls WARN_ON, so the move is to go check dmesg and make sure those warnings actually showed up. no cap β€” if you don't look at dmesg, you're not really running the test, you're just pressing buttons πŸ™ˆ

fr fr, the warnings are part of the test. check dmesg. periodt. πŸ‘‘

⭐ RETURN ⭐

void β€” it gives you nothing back. literally nothing. and that's slay of it πŸ’…


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

the whole friend group, honestly. go say hi πŸ’œ


and that's the page!! 🧚 sign-off time: this lil cutie comes from ./drivers/net/ethernet/ibm, dated October 2026, and it's filed under ibmveth_remo...om_pool_test(9) in the Kernel API Manual. take care of her, she's doing her best πŸ’–βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from