i915_vma_res...nd_dep_await(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

🌸 i915_vma_res...nd_dep_await(9) 🌸

okay so this is straight out of the Kernel API Manual bestie, and it's genuinely one of those pages where the name is longer than the function πŸ’€ the title got truncated to i915_vma_res...nd_dep_await which is giving "my group chat nickname when I type too fast" energy β€” the real one is i915_vma_resource_bind_dep_await and yes she ate.


✨ NAME ✨

i915_vma_resource_bind_dep_await β€” like, the whole vibe of this function is: make a struct i915_sw_fence wait for all the pending unbinds happening inside a certain range of a vm. that's it, that's the whole gig πŸŽ€


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

int i915_vma_resource_bind_dep_await (struct i915_address_space *vm ,
struct i915_sw_fence *sw_fence , u64 offset , u64 size , bool intr ,
gfp_t gfp );

πŸ’… ARGUMENTS πŸ’…

  • vm β€” the vm we're looking at. that's our main character ✨
  • sw_fence β€” the struct i915_sw_fence that's gonna be doing the awaiting of the unbinds 🫢
  • offset β€” where the range starts.
  • size β€” how big the range is.
  • intr β€” whether we wait interruptible (the page spells it interrubtible and honestly? iconic typo, no notes πŸ™ˆ)
  • gfp β€” the allocation mode for memory allocations.

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

So the function makes sw_fence await all pending unbinds in a certain vm range before calling the complete notifier. periodt.

now, to be able to await each individual unbind, the function needs to allocate memory using the gpf allocation mode (yes that's how it's written on the page, we're not fixing it, we're vibing πŸ’€). if that fails, the function doesn't just give up and cry β€” instead it waits for the unbind fence to signal, using intr to judge whether to wait interruptible or not. lowkey clever.

⚠️ heads up bestie, the page says gfp should ideally be selected so as to avoid any expensive memory allocation stalls and rather fail and synchronize itself. don't be out here asking for the expensive stuff πŸ™…β€β™€οΈ

and for now the vm mutex is required when calling this function, which means gfp can't call into direct reclaim. in reality? this means that during heavy memory pressure, we will sync in this function. so yeah, under pressure she syncs. that's the trade-off, no cap. 😭


⭐ RETURN ⭐

  • Zero on success πŸŽ‰
  • -ERESTARTSYS if interrupted and intr==true

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈


and that's the whole page bestie πŸ’– it lives at ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915, dated October 2026, and the header on top was literally just i915_vma_res...nd_dep_await(9) again because we love a self-referential moment. go read the source, it slays πŸ§šβ€β™€οΈπŸ‘‘

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from