i40e_notify...of_vf_enable(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– i40e_notify...of_vf_enable(9) πŸ’–

okay bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual ✨ β€” yes that's the manual name, and yes this page is literally called i40e_notify...of_vf_enable(9) and no, the ellipsis isn't me being dramatic, that's just how the kernel names things 😭


🌸 NAME 🌸

i40e_notify_client_of_vf_enable β€” the way it just… calls the client's VF notification callback πŸŽ€


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

void i40e_notify_client_of_vf_enable (struct i40e_pf *pf , u32 num_vfs );

like, that's the whole vibe. one function, two args, no cap πŸ’…


⭐ ARGUMENTS ⭐

  • pf β€” the PF device pointer 🫢 (your main character struct, fr)
  • num_vfs β€” the number of VFs currently enabled, and 0 means disable πŸ‘‘ lowkey important detail, don't sleep on it

✨ DESCRIPTION ✨

so here's the tea πŸ“ β€” if there's a client attached to this PF, it calls that client's VF notification routine. that's it. that's the whole function. iconic behaviour, honestly 🌈

ngl, "if there is a client attached" is doing a LOT of work in that sentence β€” no client, no call. just so we're clear πŸ’œ

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

Kernel file ./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_client.c β€” go read it, iykyk πŸ“–

and the whole friend group πŸ’–:


and that's the page, bestie πŸ§šπŸ’œ β€” brought to you by the source tree at ./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e, dated October 2026, and titled i40e_notify...of_vf_enable(9) because the kernel loves a mysterious ellipsis. slay πŸ’…βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from