i2c_new_slav...otify_device(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– i2c_new_slav...otify_device(9) πŸ’–

okay so this is a page straight out of the Kernel API Manual and it's lowkey serving the SMBus host-notify realness β€” let's get into it bestie 🫢


✨ NAME ✨

i2c_new_slave_host_notify_device β€” get a client for SMBus host-notify support. that's the whole assignment, and it ate πŸ’…


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

struct i2c_client * i2c_new_slave_host_notify_device (struct i2c_adapter
*adapter );

like yes, it takes one thing and gives you back a struct i2c_client *. main character energy fr πŸ”₯


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • adapter β€” the target adapter. that's it. that's the one. the adapter you're pointing at πŸ‘‘ (copy it exactly, bestie, no renaming)

πŸ¦‹ CONTEXT πŸ¦‹

can sleep 😴 β€” and ngl that's important, because this whole call is allowed to just vibe there and wait. no "don't sleep in atomic context" panic era, we're chilling 🌸


πŸ’œ DESCRIPTION πŸ’œ

so what's the actual tea? this sets up handling of the SMBus host-notify protocol on a given I2C bus segment ✨

and how does it do all that? the handling is done by creating a device and its callback, and handling data received via the SMBus host-notify address (0x8) πŸ“¬ β€” like that address is literally where the mail comes in, iykyk

this returns the client, which should be ultimately freed using i2c_free_slave_host_notify_device β€” so yes bestie, you gotta clean up after yourself, we do NOT leave clients lying around πŸ™ˆ β€” or it returns an ERRPTR to indicate an error πŸ’€

so real talk: check your return value. if it's an ERRPTR, that's an oops, not a client. do not pass go, do not dereference 🌈

⭐ SEE ALSO ⭐


and that's the whole page, no cap 🧚

this cute little number lives in the kernel source under ./drivers/i2c, and it's dated October 2026 β€” so like, future icon behavior honestly πŸ‘‘βœ¨ hope that cleared stuff up, mwah πŸ’– i2c_new_slav...otify_device(9) out! πŸ’…

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from