fm10k_sm_mbx_init(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– NAME πŸ’–

fm10k_sm_mbx_init β€” bestie, this is the one that initializes mailbox memory for the PF/SM mailbox ✨ (and yes, we're in the Kernel API Manual, pull up a chair πŸŽ€)


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

s32 fm10k_sm_mbx_init (struct fm10k_hw *hw , struct fm10k_mbx_info *mbx
, const struct fm10k_msg_data *msg_data );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • hw β€” pointer to hardware structure πŸ‘‘
  • mbx β€” pointer to mailbox πŸ’Œ
  • msg_data β€” handlers for mailbox events 🫢

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

Okay so picture this: fm10k_sm_mbx_init initializes the PF/SM mailbox for use. That's the whole vibe. πŸ¦‹

The way it works is it takes the buffer you hand it and splits it β€” then uses that split to populate both the Tx and Rx FIFO by evenly splitting it between them. Fair and square, no cap. πŸ’…

And here's the detail you can't skip, bestie: to allow for easy masking of head/tail, the value reported in size must be a power of 2, and it's reported in DWORDs, not bytes. Read that again. DWORDs. Not bytes. 😭

Any invalid values will cause the mailbox to return error. So, like, don't do that. 🫠

🌸 SEE ALSO 🌸

Kernel file ./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_mbx.c 🧚


That's the whole page, bestie β€” and for the cute sign-off: this one lives at ./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/f... (the source/version line, truncated exactly like that, no cap πŸ™ˆ) and it's dated October 2026. Go slay your mailbox init πŸ’œπŸŒˆβ­

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from