dm_test_wb_..._check_no_fb(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… dm_test_wb_..._check_no_fb(9) πŸ’…

okay so welcome to the Kernel API Manual bestie, we're looking at dm_test_wb_..._check_no_fb(9) today and honestly? it's a lil icon. it ate. let's get into it πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

dm_test_wb_atomic_check_no_fb β€” the test that verifies the function makes an early return when the job has no framebuffer. literally the vibe check for the no-fb case πŸ¦‹


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void dm_test_wb_atomic_check_no_fb (struct kunit *test );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • test β€” the KUnit test context. yeah that's it, that's the whole argument, she's low maintenance bestie πŸ’…

πŸ‘‘ DESCRIPTION πŸ‘‘

okay so picture this: a writeback job exists, right, it's there, it's real β€” but job->fb is <rainbow>NULL</rainbow> 😭 and when that happens, the function should just return 0 and not go off validating dimensions or pixel format. like, there's nothing to validate, why would she even try? she doesn't. she returns 0. main character energy fr fr ✨

no cap: no framebuffer means no dimension check and no pixel format check. early return only. periodt 🫢

πŸ’– SEE ALSO πŸ’–

Kernel file

./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_wb_test.c

and the whole bestie squad of related tests, all iconic, all here:


🌈✨ and that's the page!! quick lil sign-off before you go: this one lives under ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/..., dated October 2026, and it's giving very much "short page, big slay" πŸ’œ go read the other dm_test_wb_* pages, ily, bye πŸ“πŸ§š

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from