dm_test_hdcp...s_link_index(9)

📦 version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

okay bestie, so this is a page straight out of the Kernel API Manual — yes, that manual — and it's about a KUnit test with a name so long it's giving "my parents let the Wi-Fi name the baby" energy. Strap in 🎀

✨ NAME ✨

dm_test_hdcp_handle_cpirq_selects_link_index — literally just proving that only the work for the selected link gets queued. no cap, that's the whole vibe check 🦋

🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void dm_test_hdcp_handle_cpirq_selects_link_index (struct kunit *test );

that's it. that's the whole signature. she's a void, she takes one arg, she's iconic 💅

🫶 ARGUMENTS 🫶

  • test — the KUnit test context. yeah, the standard one. she's the main character of every KUnit test ever and we respect her 👑

💖 DESCRIPTION 💖

so here's the tea 🍓 — hdcp_handle_cpirq should schedule cpirq_work for the selected index and not go queueing up a bunch of unrelated links on the side. like, mind your business, other links!! 🙈

the test is literally checking that: selected link gets its work queued, everyone else stays unbothered. periodt ✨

🔥 SEE ALSO 🔥

okay this is the part where the manpage just... lists everyone in the group chat 😭 but like, respectful. all of them. here we go bestie, no skipping, fr fr:

like I said. the whole group chat. but every single one made it in there because I do not skip entries, not ever 🧚

and that's the whole page, bestie! one last thing before you close the tab — the source/version bit is ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... and the date on it is October 2026, so yeah, she's from the future (or at least the future of this doc). mwah 💋 go queue only the right work, okay? slay 🌟

📦 where this page comes from