dm_test_crc_...d_start_dprx(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ‘‘ dm_test_crc_source_should_start_dprx β€” a Kernel API Manual moment πŸ’…

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual β€” this page is literally all about dm_test_crc_...d_start_dprx(9) (yes the title is doing the absolute most with that truncation, we love her anyway πŸŽ€). Buckle up, it's a KUnit test and she's precious.


✨ NAME ✨

dm_test_crc_source_should_start_dprx β€” the test that checks up on dm_crc_source_should_start_dprx(). it's giving "responsible friend verifying you actually did the thing" 🫢


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void dm_test_crc_source_should_start_dprx (struct kunit *test );

πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • test β€” the KUnit test context. that's it, that's the whole argument. she's low-maintenance πŸ’…

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

so what does this test actually do? okay so β€” it verifies that dm_crc_source_should_start_dprx returns true only when CRC is transitioning from off (!enabled) to a DPRX source (enable && is_dprx(source)). like, that's the one singular moment she's allowed to say yes ✨

and for every other combination? false. all of them. no cap. including the cases where it's already enabled, or the target is non-DPRX. those get a big fat nope πŸ’€

it's giving "strict bouncer at the club, if you're not on the list you're not getting in" πŸ”₯


🧚 SEE ALSO 🧚

the whole friend group, fr fr β€” go say hi:


πŸ’œ and that's the whole page bestie. go forth and test responsibly.

okay so the sign-off era: this iconic little page lives at ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... and it's dated October 2026 β€” future queen behavior honestly ⭐ slay, bye! πŸŒˆπŸ’…

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from