dm_test_appl...nonzero_wait(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… dm_test_appl...nonzero_wait(9) β€” the Kernel API Manual glow-up

okay bestie, so we're looking at dm_test_appl...nonzero_wait(9) from the Kernel API Manual β€” yes that's the section-9 manual, and yes she's a kernel test girlie. come on in, this one's short but she's important πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

dm_test_apply_delay_nonzero_wait β€” literally a test that checks a non-zero wait interval actually executes the delay path. no cap, that's the whole personality πŸ’…


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void dm_test_apply_delay_nonzero_wait (struct kunit *test );

that's it. one function, no return value, she just goes in and vibes πŸ¦‹


🫢 ARGUMENTS 🫢

  • test β€” the KUnit test context. yeah, that's your main character right there, it's the KUnit testing framework's context struct and it's the only thing she asks of you πŸ‘‘

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

okay so the kernel file lives right here, go look at the source, it's giving transparency and I respect it:

./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_test.c

and now the friend group πŸ’– β€” the whole squad of sibling tests:

like, that's the whole ah hoc test family and they're all lowkey iconic 🌈


ok that's the whole page bestie β€” no options, no exit statuses, no environment variables, no warnings hiding in here. she's a one-function wonder and she ate ✨

and for the cute sign-off: this little beauty comes from the source ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... and she's dated October 2026 πŸ’œ so go forth, run your KUnit tests, and remember β€” non-zero wait intervals deserve to have their delay path executed too. periodt. πŸŽ€πŸ¦‹πŸ‘‘

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from