dm_test_adju...10bpc_passes(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… dm_test_adju...10bpc_passes(9) β€” like, the KERNEL API MANUAL page, bestie ✨

Okay so real talk: this is a page out of the Kernel API Manual, section 9, and its whole name is a mouthful: dm_test_adjust_colour_depth_10bpc_passes. It got truncated in the header to dm_test_adju...10bpc_passes(9) because even manpages have a character limit, and honestly? relatable.


🌸 NAME 🌸

dm_test_adjust_colour_depth_10bpc_passes β€” it tests the "Adjust colour depth" 10bpc passes thing</p>. That's literally the job. That's the whole vibe. πŸ’–


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

void dm_test_adjust_colour_depth_10bpc_passes (struct kunit *test );

Yep, that's it. One function, void, no return value, no drama. πŸŽ€


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • test β€” the KUnit test context πŸ’… that's the one and only thing you hand it. It's the context. It's KUnit. It goes in, the test does its thing.

πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

First up, the actual kernel file where all this lives, no cap:

  • ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_connector_test.c

And then β€” and I'm not kidding β€” the friend group. Every single one of these is a (9) sibling and they all get to be mentioned, so here we go, main-character energy for each:

Like… that's the whole roll call 🫢 every single one is a real (9) page you can go read. Not me listing 200-plus of them and still being obsessed. 😭

πŸŽ€ the sign-off πŸŽ€

This page came from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... (yes, the path is elided in the footer too, we love a mystery) and it's dated October 2026 ⭐ β€” same date as the dm_test_adju...10bpc_passes(9) header up top, so it's giving consistent. slay. πŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from