dm_register_...ify_callback(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

🌸 NAME 🌸

okay so welcome to the Kernel API Manual page for dm_register_...ify_callback(9) β€” yes, the header is doing the most, but the actual function is dm_register_dmub_notify_callback, and it Sets callback for DMUB notify. periodt πŸ’…

  • dm_register_dmub_notify_callback β€” Sets callback for DMUB notify

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

bestie, here's the whole signature, copied exactly so nobody comes for me:

bool dm_register_dmub_notify_callback (struct amdgpu_device *adev , enum
dmub_notification_type type , dmub_notify_interrupt_callback_t callback
, bool dmub_int_thread_offload );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • adev β€” it's the amdgpu_device pointer, bestie. the main character of the GPU device world 🫢
  • type β€” the type of dmub notification. gotta know what kinda notification we're dealing with πŸ’Œ
  • callback β€” the Dmub interrupt callback function. like, the function that gets called when the interrupt says hi πŸ”₯
  • dmub_int_thread_offload β€” the offload indicator. literally the little flag that says whether we're offloading or not πŸ‘‘

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

so this is the API to register a dmub callback handler for a dmub notification. iconic. it also sets an indicator for whether callback processing is supposed to be offloaded β€” specifically, offloaded to the dmub interrupt handling thread. no cap, that's the whole vibe check πŸ’–


πŸ’€ RETURN πŸ’€

it returns true if successfully registered, and false if there is existing registration. so like, false means somebody already claimed that spot 😭 β€” no silent overwrite drama here, fr fr.


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈


mwah πŸ’‹ β€” this page came from source/version ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/..., dated October 2026, and yes bestie it's still the dm_register_...ify_callback(9) page. byeee 🫢✨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from